Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Your brain doesn’t look a day past 70! Cross-sectional associations with brain-predicted age in the cognitively-intact oldest-old

  • Mark K. Britton
  • , Hannah Hoogerwoerd
  • , Joshua Juhasz
  • , Keyanni Joy Johnson
  • , Paul D. Stewart
  • , Pradyumna K. Bharadwaj
  • , Stacy S. Merritt
  • , Cortney J. Jessup
  • , Clinton B. Wright
  • , G. Alex Hishaw
  • , David A. Raichlen
  • , Victor A. Del Bene
  • , Virginia G. Wadley
  • , Theodore P. Trouard
  • , Noam Alperin
  • , Bonnie E. Levin
  • , Tatjana Rundek
  • , Kristina M. Visscher
  • , Gene E. Alexander
  • , Ronald A. Cohen
  • Eric C. Porges, Joseph M. Gullett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The cognitively-intact oldest-old (85 +) may be the most-resilient members of their birth cohort; due to survivorship effects (e.g., depletion of susceptibles), risk factors associated with brain aging biomarkers in younger samples may not generalize to the cognitively-intact oldest-old. We evaluated associations between established aging-related risk factors and brain-predicted age difference (brainPAD) in a cross-sectional cognitively-intact oldest-old sample. Additionally, we evaluated brainPAD-cognition associations to characterize brain maintenance vs. cognitive reserve in our sample. Oldest-old adults (N = 206; 85–99 years; Montreal Cognitive Assessment > 22 or neurologist evaluation) underwent T1-weighted MRI; brainPAD was generated with brainageR, such that more-positive brainPAD reflected more-advanced brain aging. Sex, education, alcohol and smoking history, exercise history, BMI, cardiovascular and metabolic disease history, and anticholinergic medication burden were self-reported. Global cognitive z-score and coefficient of variation were derived from the UDS 3.0 cognitive battery; crystallized-fluid discrepancy was derived from the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery. Mean brainPAD was -7.99 (SD: 5.37; range: -24.50, 6.03). Women showed more-delayed brain aging than men (B = -2.9, 95% CI = -4.6, -1.1, p = 0.002). No other exposures were significantly associated with brainPAD. BrainPAD was not associated with any cognitive variable. These findings suggest that cognitively-intact oldest-old adults may be atypically-resistant to risk factors associated with aging in younger samples, consistent with survivorship effects in aging. Furthermore, brainPAD may have limited explanatory value for cognitive performance in cognitively-intact oldest-old adults, potentially due to high cognitive reserve. Overall, our findings highlight the impact of survivorship effects on brain aging research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGeroScience
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • Cognitive aging
  • Epidemiologic factors
  • Longevity
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Selection bias
  • Supervised machine learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging
  • veterinary (miscalleneous)
  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Your brain doesn’t look a day past 70! Cross-sectional associations with brain-predicted age in the cognitively-intact oldest-old'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this