Abstract
Stephen Darwall has recently suggested (following work by Mark Overvold) that theories which identify a person's good with her own ranking of concerns do not properly delimit the 'scope' of welfare, making self-sacrifice conceptually impossible. But whether a theory of welfare makes self-sacrifice impossible depends on what self-sacrifice is. I offer an alternative analysis to Overvold's, explaining why self-interest and self-sacrifice need not be opposed, and so why the problems of delimiting the scope of welfare and of allowing for self-sacrifice are distinct. If my analysis is correct, desire theories may allow for self-sacrifice however they delimit the scope of welfare.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 311-325 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue number | 1 PART 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2009 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'XV - Self-interest and self-sacrifice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS