X-ray, UV, and optical observations of supernova 2006bp with Swift: Detection of early X-ray emission

  • S. Immler
  • , P. J. Brown
  • , P. Milne
  • , L. Dessart
  • , P. A. Mazzali
  • , W. Landsman
  • , N. Gehrels
  • , R. Petre
  • , D. N. Burrows
  • , J. A. Nousek
  • , R. A. Chevalier
  • , C. L. Williams
  • , M. Koss
  • , C. J. Stockdale
  • , M. T. Kelley
  • , K. W. Weiler
  • , S. T. Holland
  • , E. Pian
  • , P. W.A. Roming
  • , D. Pooley
  • K. Nomoto, J. Greiner, S. Campana, A. M. Soderberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present results on the X-ray and optical/UV emission from the Type H-P supernova (SN) 2006bp and the interaction of the SN shock with its environment, obtained with the X-Ray Telescope (XRT) and UV/Optical Telescope (UVOT) on board Swift. SN 2006bp is detected in X-rays at a 4.5 a level of significance in the merged XRT data from days 1 to 12 after the explosion. If the 0.2-10 keV band X-ray luminosity of L0.2-10 = (1.8 ±0.4) x 1039 ergs s-1 is caused by interaction of the SN shock with circumstellar material (CSM) deposited by a stellar wind from the progenitor's companion star, a mass-loss rate of M ≈(1 × 10-5 M yr -1)(vw/10 km s-1) is inferred. The mass-loss rate is consistent with the nondetection in the radio with the VLA on days 2, 9, and 11 after the explosion and is characteristic of a red supergiant progenitor with a mass of ≈12-15 M⊙ prior to the explosion. The Swift data further show a fading of the X-ray emission starting around day 12 after the explosion. In combination with a follow-up XMM-Newton observation obtained on day 21 after the explosion, an X-ray rate of decline of Lxα t-n with index n = 1.2 ±0.6 is inferred. Since no other SN has been detected in X-rays prior to the optical peak, and since Type II-P SNe have an extended "plateau" phase in the optical, we discuss the scenario that the X-rays might be due to inverse Compton scattering of photospheric optical photons offrelativistic electrons produced in circumstellar shocks. However, due to the high required value of the Lorentz factor (≈10-100), which is inconsistent with the ejecta velocity inferred from optical line widths, we conclude that inverse Compton scattering is an unlikely explanation for the observed X-ray emission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-442
Number of pages8
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume664
Issue number1 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 20 2007

Keywords

  • Circumstellar matter
  • Supernovae: individual (SN 2006bp)
  • Ultraviolet: ISM X-rays: general
  • X-rays: ISM
  • X-rays: individual (SN 2006bp)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'X-ray, UV, and optical observations of supernova 2006bp with Swift: Detection of early X-ray emission'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this