TY - JOUR
T1 - Workplace availability, risk group and perceived barriers predictive of 2016–17 influenza vaccine uptake in the United States
T2 - A cross-sectional study
AU - Luz, Paula M.
AU - Johnson, Riley E.
AU - Brown, Heidi E.
N1 - Funding Information:
PML acknowledges funding from the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development and the FAPERJ (Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/10/13
Y1 - 2017/10/13
N2 - Background Seasonal influenza, though mostly self-limited in the healthy adult, may lead to severe disease and/or complications in subpopulations. Annual influenza vaccination is available in many countries with coverage goals rarely being met. We conducted a cross-sectional study of influenza vaccine uptake and explored socio-demographic, economic, and psychological factors that explained vaccine uptake. Methods The survey was administered via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to United States residents in January 2017, using the Qualtrics platform. Using principal axis factor analysis, we reduced the 25 items theory-based psychological determinants into the primary constructs they measure if/when internal consistency was sufficient (Cronbach's alpha >0.60). Logistic regression models were used to quantify the association of socio-demographic, economic, and psychological factors with reported vaccine behavior in the 2016–17 flu season. Results 1007 participants completed the survey, sex distribution was even, 67% had 25–44 years of age, and 61% annual household income of $30–99 thousand United States dollars. About 25% had the flu shot offered at their workplace and 20% reported belonging to a group for whom the flu shot is recommended. Vaccine uptake was 31.5%. Eight predictors remained in the final adjusted model (R2 = 0.489), having the vaccine offered at the workplace, belonging to a group for whom the vaccine is recommended, and higher perceived barriers were the strongest predictors of vaccine uptake, increasing (and decreasing in the case of barriers) the odds by >3-fold. Additionally, higher household income, higher perceived susceptibility and higher perceived benefits also independently predicted vaccine uptake. Discussion We found evidence that perceived barriers significantly impaired vaccine uptake to the same extent that having the vaccine offered at the workplace or belonging to a group for whom the vaccine is recommended facilitated uptake. Ideally, a better understanding of drivers of vaccine hesitancy will result in improved interventions to increase vaccine uptake.
AB - Background Seasonal influenza, though mostly self-limited in the healthy adult, may lead to severe disease and/or complications in subpopulations. Annual influenza vaccination is available in many countries with coverage goals rarely being met. We conducted a cross-sectional study of influenza vaccine uptake and explored socio-demographic, economic, and psychological factors that explained vaccine uptake. Methods The survey was administered via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to United States residents in January 2017, using the Qualtrics platform. Using principal axis factor analysis, we reduced the 25 items theory-based psychological determinants into the primary constructs they measure if/when internal consistency was sufficient (Cronbach's alpha >0.60). Logistic regression models were used to quantify the association of socio-demographic, economic, and psychological factors with reported vaccine behavior in the 2016–17 flu season. Results 1007 participants completed the survey, sex distribution was even, 67% had 25–44 years of age, and 61% annual household income of $30–99 thousand United States dollars. About 25% had the flu shot offered at their workplace and 20% reported belonging to a group for whom the flu shot is recommended. Vaccine uptake was 31.5%. Eight predictors remained in the final adjusted model (R2 = 0.489), having the vaccine offered at the workplace, belonging to a group for whom the vaccine is recommended, and higher perceived barriers were the strongest predictors of vaccine uptake, increasing (and decreasing in the case of barriers) the odds by >3-fold. Additionally, higher household income, higher perceived susceptibility and higher perceived benefits also independently predicted vaccine uptake. Discussion We found evidence that perceived barriers significantly impaired vaccine uptake to the same extent that having the vaccine offered at the workplace or belonging to a group for whom the vaccine is recommended facilitated uptake. Ideally, a better understanding of drivers of vaccine hesitancy will result in improved interventions to increase vaccine uptake.
KW - Health attitude
KW - Influenza
KW - Vaccine hesitancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028857946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028857946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.078
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.078
M3 - Article
C2 - 28890192
AN - SCOPUS:85028857946
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 35
SP - 5890
EP - 5896
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 43
ER -