Who Steers the Field of Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulations? An American-European Comparison

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations


This chapter examines whether the European Union or the United States set the parameters in the field of consumer protection and environmental regulations. The analysis points out that there is no straightforward answer because leadership rotates or fluctuates depending on the extent to which societies and decision makers feel strongly about a particular issue. Examples are tobacco control and regulations with regards to genetically modified crops and food. The US identified the risks related to the wide availability of cigarettes before the EU, while the EU highlighted the risks related to the introduction of GM crops/products in the absence of similar American concerns. Both cultural and institutional developments account for this divergence. A unique combination of factors heightened the salience of anti-smoking measures in the US, while an equally distinctive matrix of developments highlighted the social, economic, health, and safety challenges of genetically modified organism (GMO). However, in spite of different constellations of institutional and cultural factors, the EU has embraced tobacco control and the American private sector is slightly more cautious about pushing GM crops onto the market.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEuropean Responses to Globalization Resistance, Adaptation and Alternatives
EditorsJanet Laible, Henri Barkey
Number of pages23
StatePublished - 2006

Publication series

NameContemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis
ISSN (Print)1569-3759

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Who Steers the Field of Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulations? An American-European Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this