TY - JOUR
T1 - Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems?
AU - Afonin, Andrei
AU - Chertkov, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by MC’s seed funding at UArizona.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Afonin and Chertkov.
PY - 2021/8/31
Y1 - 2021/8/31
N2 - We consider a power transmission system monitored using phasor measurement units (PMUs) placed at significant, but not all, nodes of the system. Assuming that a sufficient number of distinct single-line faults, specifically the pre-fault state and the (not cleared) post-fault state, are recorded by the PMUs and are available for training, we first design a comprehensive sequence of neural networks (NNs) locating the faulty line. Performance of different NNs in the sequence, including linear regression, feed-forward NNs, AlexNet, graph convolutional NNs, neural linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and neural graph-based ODEs, ordered according to the type and amount of the power flow physics involved, are compared for different levels of observability. Second, we build a sequence of advanced power system dynamics–informed and neural ODE–based machine learning schemes that are trained, given the pre-fault state, to predict the post-fault state and also, in parallel, to estimate system parameters. Finally, third and continuing to work with the first (fault localization) setting, we design an (NN-based) algorithm which discovers optimal PMU placement.
AB - We consider a power transmission system monitored using phasor measurement units (PMUs) placed at significant, but not all, nodes of the system. Assuming that a sufficient number of distinct single-line faults, specifically the pre-fault state and the (not cleared) post-fault state, are recorded by the PMUs and are available for training, we first design a comprehensive sequence of neural networks (NNs) locating the faulty line. Performance of different NNs in the sequence, including linear regression, feed-forward NNs, AlexNet, graph convolutional NNs, neural linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and neural graph-based ODEs, ordered according to the type and amount of the power flow physics involved, are compared for different levels of observability. Second, we build a sequence of advanced power system dynamics–informed and neural ODE–based machine learning schemes that are trained, given the pre-fault state, to predict the post-fault state and also, in parallel, to estimate system parameters. Finally, third and continuing to work with the first (fault localization) setting, we design an (NN-based) algorithm which discovers optimal PMU placement.
KW - fault localization
KW - neural networks
KW - physics-informed machine learning
KW - power system
KW - state estimation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114997827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114997827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fdata.2021.692493
DO - 10.3389/fdata.2021.692493
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114997827
SN - 2624-909X
VL - 4
JO - Frontiers in Big Data
JF - Frontiers in Big Data
M1 - 692493
ER -