When preservationism doesn't preserve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


According to conservationism, scarce and precious resources should be conserved and used wisely. According to preservation ethics, we should not think of wilderness as merely a resource. Wilderness commands reverence in a way mere resources do not. Each philosophy, I argue, can fail by its own lights, because trying to put the principles of conservationism or preservationism into institutional practice can have results that are the opposite of what the respective philosophies tell us we ought to be trying to achieve. For example, if the wisest use of South American rainforests is no use at all, then in that case conservationism by its own lights defers to preservationism. Analogously, if, when deprived of the option of preserving elephants as a resource, Africans respond by not preserving elephants at all, then in that case preservationism by its own lights defers to conservationism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-339
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Values
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1997


  • Animal rights
  • Elephant hunting
  • Moral theory
  • Virtue ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science
  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'When preservationism doesn't preserve'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this