Abstract
Using 23 novel indicators and a 1,000+ sample representative of a full undergraduate population we examined: how much consensus there was about perceptions of the incivility/civility of various categories of speech/behavior; and whether political incivility is a unidimensional or multidimensional latent construct. Confirmatory factor analyses suggest perceived political incivility is a multidimensional construct. Insulting utterances, deception, and behaviors tending to shut down inclusive ongoing discussion can be treated as distinct, underlying aspects of incivility. More than 75% of respondents viewed all 23 indicators, except issue-oriented attacks, as very, mostly, or somewhat uncivil. If replicated on a representative national sample, standardized indicators of political incivility should be constructed and routinely employed in national surveys of political attitudes and behavior.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 535-556 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Communication Monographs |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Incivility
- deliberation
- discourse
- measurement
- politics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What is political incivility?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS