What is meant by 'what is said'? A reply to Cappelen and Lepore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


In a recent paper Herman Cappelen and Ernie Lepore challenge an assumption that they rightly claim is pervasive among contemporary philosophers of language. According to this assumption (MA), an adequate semantic theory T for a language L should assign p as the semantic content of a sentence S in L if and only if in uttering S a speaker says that p. I claim that the arguments of Cappelen and Lepore are based upon an uncharitable interpretation of MA. If 'saying' is understood in a roughly Gricean sense, MA emerges as an eminently plausible assumption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)598-604
Number of pages7
JournalMind and Language
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language


Dive into the research topics of 'What is meant by 'what is said'? A reply to Cappelen and Lepore'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this