Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What do mathematicians want? Probabilistic proofs and the epistemic goals of mathematicians

  • Don Fallis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Several philosophers have used the framework of means/ends reasoning to explain the methodological choices made by scientists and mathematicians (see, e.g., Goldman 1999, Levi 1962, Maddy 1997). In particular, they have tried to identify the epistemic objectives of scientists and mathematicians that will explain these choices. In this paper, the framework of means/ends reasoning is used to study an important methodological choice made by mathematicians. Namely, mathematicians will only use deductive proofs to establish the truth of mathematical claims. In this paper, I argue that none of the epistemic objectives of mathematicians that are currently on the table provide a satisfactory explanation of this rejection of probabilistic proofs.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)373-388
    Number of pages16
    JournalLogique et Analyse
    Volume45
    Issue number179-180
    StatePublished - 2002

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What do mathematicians want? Probabilistic proofs and the epistemic goals of mathematicians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this