Abstract
Popular trust in political institutions is vital to democracy, but in post-Communist countries, popular distrust for institutions is widespread, and prospects for generating increased political trust are uncertain given disagreements over its origins. Cultural theories emphasizing exogenous determinants of trust compete with institutional theories emphasizing endogenous influences, and both can be further differentiated into micro and macro variants. Competing hypotheses drawn from these theories are tested using data from 10 post-Communist countries in Eastern and Central Europe and the former Soviet Union. Aggregate data on economic and political performance are combined with survey data on interpersonal and political trust, political socialization experiences, and individual evaluations of national performance. Results strongly support the superiority of institutional explanations of the origins of political trust, especially microlevel explanations, while providing little support for either micro-cultural or macro-cultural explanations. This encourages cautious optimism about the potential for nurturing popular trust in new democratic institutions.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 30-62 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Comparative Political Studies |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2001 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS