TY - JOUR
T1 - “Wayfinding” through the AI wilderness
T2 - Mapping rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on X (formerly Twitter) to promote critical AI literacies
AU - Gupta, Anuj
AU - Shivers-McNair, Ann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - In this paper, we demonstrate how studying the rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on social media can promote critical AI literacies. Prompt writing is the process of writing instructions for generative AI tools like ChatGPT to elicit desired outputs and there has been an upsurge of conversations about it on social media. To study this rhetorical activity, we build on four overlapping traditions of digital writing research in computers and composition that inform how we frame literacies, how we study social media rhetorics, how we engage iteratively and reflexively with methodologies and technologies, and how we blend computational methods with qualitative methods. Drawing on these four traditions, our paper shows our iterative research process through which we gathered and analyzed a dataset of 32,000 posts (formerly known as tweets) from X (formerly Twitter) about prompt writing posted between November 2022 to May 2023. We present five themes about these emerging AI literacy practices: (1) areas of communication impacted by prompt writing, (2) micro-literacy resources shared for prompt writing, (3) market rhetoric shaping prompt writing, (4) rhetorical characteristics of prompts, and (5) definitions of prompt writing. In discussing these themes and our methodologies, we highlight takeaways for digital writing teachers and researchers who are teaching and analyzing critical AI literacies.
AB - In this paper, we demonstrate how studying the rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on social media can promote critical AI literacies. Prompt writing is the process of writing instructions for generative AI tools like ChatGPT to elicit desired outputs and there has been an upsurge of conversations about it on social media. To study this rhetorical activity, we build on four overlapping traditions of digital writing research in computers and composition that inform how we frame literacies, how we study social media rhetorics, how we engage iteratively and reflexively with methodologies and technologies, and how we blend computational methods with qualitative methods. Drawing on these four traditions, our paper shows our iterative research process through which we gathered and analyzed a dataset of 32,000 posts (formerly known as tweets) from X (formerly Twitter) about prompt writing posted between November 2022 to May 2023. We present five themes about these emerging AI literacy practices: (1) areas of communication impacted by prompt writing, (2) micro-literacy resources shared for prompt writing, (3) market rhetoric shaping prompt writing, (4) rhetorical characteristics of prompts, and (5) definitions of prompt writing. In discussing these themes and our methodologies, we highlight takeaways for digital writing teachers and researchers who are teaching and analyzing critical AI literacies.
KW - AI
KW - Algorithms
KW - ChatGPT
KW - Computational methods
KW - Critical AI literacy
KW - Digital rhetoric
KW - Machine learning
KW - Prompt engineering
KW - Prompt writing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204899918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85204899918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102882
DO - 10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102882
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85204899918
SN - 8755-4615
VL - 74
JO - Computers and Composition
JF - Computers and Composition
M1 - 102882
ER -