Water degradation implications when whole-farm irrigation water is binding

Myles J. Watts, Joseph Atwood, Bruce R. Beattie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


This paper demonstrates that with a binding resource constraint, such as water rights in the western United States, policy instruments that are effective in reducing water degradation associated with irrigated agriculture are likely to differ from those policies found effective in the absence of resource constraints. Under plausible circumstances, modest increases in per unit water charges will have no effect upon hectares irrigated or per hectare water application rates. Higher annual irrigation setup costs such as higher irrigated land taxes will result in reduced irrigated hectares with increased water applied per irrigated hectare and more chemical application per irrigated hectare. Such adjustments have the potential to exacerbate water contamination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalWater Resources and Economics
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015


  • Irrigation
  • Production economics
  • Water degradation
  • Water rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Water Science and Technology


Dive into the research topics of 'Water degradation implications when whole-farm irrigation water is binding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this