Variability in functional outcome and treatment practices by treatment center after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: analysis of International Cardiac Arrest Registry

  • Teresa L. May
  • , Christine W. Lary
  • , Richard R. Riker
  • , Hans Friberg
  • , Nainesh Patel
  • , Eldar Søreide
  • , John A. McPherson
  • , Johan Undén
  • , Robert Hand
  • , Kjetil Sunde
  • , Pascal Stammet
  • , Stein Rubertsson
  • , Jan Belohlvaek
  • , Allison Dupont
  • , Karen G. Hirsch
  • , Felix Valsson
  • , Karl Kern
  • , Farid Sadaka
  • , Johan Israelsson
  • , Josef Dankiewicz
  • Niklas Nielsen, David B. Seder, Sachin Agarwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Functional outcomes vary between centers after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and are partially explained by pre-existing health status and arrest characteristics, while the effects of in-hospital treatments on functional outcome are less understood. We examined variation in functional outcomes by center after adjusting for patient- and arrest-specific characteristics and evaluated how in-hospital management differs between high- and low-performing centers. Methods: Analysis of observational registry data within the International Cardiac Arrest Registry was used to perform a hierarchical model of center-specific risk standardized rates for good outcome, adjusted for demographics, pre-existing functional status, and arrest-related factors with treatment center as a random effect variable. We described the variability in treatments and diagnostic tests that may influence outcome at centers with adjusted rates significantly above and below registry average. Results: A total of 3855 patients were admitted to an ICU following cardiac arrest with return of spontaneous circulation. The overall prevalence of good outcome was 11–63% among centers. After adjustment, center-specific risk standardized rates for good functional outcome ranged from 0.47 (0.37–0.58) to 0.20 (0.12–0.26). High-performing centers had faster time to goal temperature, were more likely to have goal temperature of 33 °C, more likely to perform unconscious cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention, and had differing prognostication practices than low-performing centers. Conclusions: Center-specific differences in outcomes after OHCA after adjusting for patient-specific factors exist. This variation could partially be explained by in-hospital management differences. Future research should address the contribution of these factors to the differences in outcomes after resuscitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)637-646
Number of pages10
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Center variability
  • Out of hospital arrest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variability in functional outcome and treatment practices by treatment center after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: analysis of International Cardiac Arrest Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this