Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests

P. Harber

doi:10.1378/chest.88.6.874

Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests

P. Harber

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	874-877
Number of pages	4
Journal	CHEST
Volume	88
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.88.6.874
State	Published - 1985
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1378/chest.88.6.874

Cite this

@article{4a737c0b5b4f468fa1f857ad73c3a030,

title = "Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests",

abstract = "Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.",

author = "P. Harber",

note = "Funding Information: Supported in part by a grant from the UCLA Academic Senate. ",

year = "1985",

doi = "10.1378/chest.88.6.874",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "88",

pages = "874--877",

journal = "CHEST",

issn = "0012-3692",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests

AU - Harber, P.

N1 - Funding Information: Supported in part by a grant from the UCLA Academic Senate.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.

AB - Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0022414433

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0022414433#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1378/chest.88.6.874

DO - 10.1378/chest.88.6.874

M3 - Article

C2 - 4064777

AN - SCOPUS:0022414433

SN - 0012-3692

VL - 88

SP - 874

EP - 877

JO - CHEST

JF - CHEST

IS - 6

ER -

Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this