Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: Results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials

  • Zhao Chen
  • , Charles Kooperberg
  • , Mary B. Pettinger
  • , Tamsen Bassford
  • , Jane A. Cauley
  • , Andrea Z. LaCroix
  • , Cora E. Lewis
  • , Simon Kipersztok
  • , Carolyn Borne
  • , Rebecca D. Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of, and factors associated with, the accuracy of self-report (participant-report and proxy-report) for fractures. Design: Study participants were from the Women's Health Initiative Clinical Trial and Observational Study cohorts. All women were postmenopausal; populations included American Indian, Asian/Pacific Islander, black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white. The average length of follow-up was 4.3 years. Self-reported fractures were adjudicated by reviewing medical records. The first adjudicated self-report of fractures for each participant was included in the analysis (n = 6,652). Results: We found substantial variations in validity of self-report by the fracture site. Agreements between self-reports for single-site fractures and medical records were high for hip (78%) and forearm/wrist (81%) but relatively lower for clinical spine fractures (51%). The average confirmation rate for all single-site fractures was 71%. Misidentification of fracture sites by participants or proxy-reporters seemed to be a cause of unconfirmed self-reports. Higher confirmation rates were observed in participant-reports than in proxy-reports. Results of the multivariate analysis indicated that multiple factors, such as ethnicity, a history of osteoporosis or fractures, body mass index, years since menopause, smoking status, and number of falls in the past year were significantly (P < 0.05) related to the validity of self-report. Conclusion: The validity of self-reports for fracture varies by fracture sites and many other factors. The assessed validity in this study is likely conservative because some of the unconfirmed self-reports may be due to poor medical record systems. The validity of self-reports for hip and forearm/wrist fractures is high in this study, supporting their use in epidemiological studies among postmenopausal women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)264-274
Number of pages11
JournalMenopause
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Observational study
  • Postmenopausal women
  • Self-report for fracture
  • Validity
  • Women's Health Initiative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: Results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this