TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale
T2 - A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study
AU - the Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Investigators
AU - Riehm, Kira E.
AU - Kwakkenbos, Linda
AU - Carrier, Marie Eve
AU - Bartlett, Susan J.
AU - Malcarne, Vanessa L.
AU - Mouthon, Luc
AU - Nielson, Warren R.
AU - Poiraudeau, Serge
AU - Nielsen, Karen
AU - Baron, Murray
AU - Frech, Tracy
AU - Hudson, Marie
AU - Pope, Janet
AU - Sauve, Maureen
AU - Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
AU - Wigley, Fredrick M.
AU - Thombs, Brett D.
AU - Furst, Dan
AU - Gottesman, Karen
AU - Mayes, Maureen D.
AU - Riggs, Robert
AU - van den Hoogen, Frank
AU - Assassi, Shervin
AU - Boutron, Isabelle
AU - Costa Maia, Angela
AU - El-Baalbaki, Ghassan
AU - Ells, Carolyn
AU - van den Ende, Cornelia H.M.
AU - Fligelstone, Kim
AU - Fortune, Catherine
AU - Godard, Dominique
AU - Harel, Daphna
AU - Impens, Ann
AU - Jang, Yeona
AU - Johnson, Sindhu R.
AU - Tyrell Kennedy, Ann
AU - Körner, Annett
AU - Leite, Catarina
AU - Marra, Carlo
AU - Poole, Janet L.
AU - Portales, Alexandra
AU - Sofia Rodriguez Reyna, Tatiana
AU - Schouffoer, Anne A.
AU - Steele, Russell J.
AU - Welling, Joep
AU - Wong-Rieger, Durhane
AU - Albert, Alexandra
AU - Arsenault, Guylaine
AU - Carreira, Patricia
AU - Fox, Rina S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - Objective: Self-management programs for patients with chronic illnesses, including rheumatic diseases, seek to enhance self-efficacy for performing health management behaviors. No measure of self-efficacy has been validated for patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma). The objective of this study was to assess the validity and internal consistency reliability of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD) scale in SSc. Methods: English-speaking SSc patients enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort who completed the SEMCD scale at their baseline assessment between March 2014 and June 2015 were included. Patients were enrolled from 21 sites in Canada, the US, and the UK. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the factor structure of the SEMCD scale. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency reliability. Hypotheses on the direction and magnitude of Pearson's correlations with psychological and physical outcome measures were formulated and tested to examine convergent validity. Results: A total of 553 patients were included. CFA supported the single-factor structure of the SEMCD scale (Tucker Lewis Index = 0.99, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.10). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.93), and correlations with measures of psychological and physical functioning were moderate to large (|r| = 0.48–0.67, P < 0.001), confirming study hypotheses. Conclusion: Scores from the SEMCD scale are valid for measuring self-efficacy in patients with SSc, and results support using the scale as an outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of self-management programs in SSc.
AB - Objective: Self-management programs for patients with chronic illnesses, including rheumatic diseases, seek to enhance self-efficacy for performing health management behaviors. No measure of self-efficacy has been validated for patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma). The objective of this study was to assess the validity and internal consistency reliability of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD) scale in SSc. Methods: English-speaking SSc patients enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort who completed the SEMCD scale at their baseline assessment between March 2014 and June 2015 were included. Patients were enrolled from 21 sites in Canada, the US, and the UK. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the factor structure of the SEMCD scale. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency reliability. Hypotheses on the direction and magnitude of Pearson's correlations with psychological and physical outcome measures were formulated and tested to examine convergent validity. Results: A total of 553 patients were included. CFA supported the single-factor structure of the SEMCD scale (Tucker Lewis Index = 0.99, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.10). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.93), and correlations with measures of psychological and physical functioning were moderate to large (|r| = 0.48–0.67, P < 0.001), confirming study hypotheses. Conclusion: Scores from the SEMCD scale are valid for measuring self-efficacy in patients with SSc, and results support using the scale as an outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of self-management programs in SSc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978786348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978786348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/acr.22807
DO - 10.1002/acr.22807
M3 - Article
C2 - 26619042
AN - SCOPUS:84978786348
SN - 2151-464X
VL - 68
SP - 1195
EP - 1200
JO - Arthritis Care and Research
JF - Arthritis Care and Research
IS - 8
ER -