TY - JOUR
T1 - Using Indigenous Standards to Implement the CARE Principles
T2 - Setting Expectations through Tribal Research Codes
AU - Carroll, Stephanie Russo
AU - Garba, Ibrahim
AU - Plevel, Rebecca
AU - Small-Rodriguez, Desi
AU - Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y.
AU - Hudson, Maui
AU - Garrison, Nanibaa’ A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation supported SC, IG, and RP.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Carroll, Garba, Plevel, Small-Rodriguez, Hiratsuka, Hudson and Garrison.
PY - 2022/3/21
Y1 - 2022/3/21
N2 - Biomedical data are now organized in large-scale databases allowing researchers worldwide to access and utilize the data for new projects. As new technologies generate even larger amounts of data, data governance and data management are becoming pressing challenges. The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) were developed to facilitate data sharing. However, the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement advocates for greater Indigenous control and oversight in order to share data on Indigenous Peoples’ terms. This is especially true in the context of genetic research where Indigenous Peoples historically have been unethically exploited in the name of science. This article outlines the relationship between sovereignty and ethics in the context of data to describe the collective rights that Indigenous Peoples assert to increase control over their biomedical data. Then drawing on the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), we explore how standards already set by Native nations in the United States, such as tribal research codes, provide direction for implementation of the CARE Principles to complement FAIR. A broader approach to policy and procedure regarding tribal participation in biomedical research is required and we make recommendations for tribes, institutions, and ethical practice.
AB - Biomedical data are now organized in large-scale databases allowing researchers worldwide to access and utilize the data for new projects. As new technologies generate even larger amounts of data, data governance and data management are becoming pressing challenges. The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) were developed to facilitate data sharing. However, the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement advocates for greater Indigenous control and oversight in order to share data on Indigenous Peoples’ terms. This is especially true in the context of genetic research where Indigenous Peoples historically have been unethically exploited in the name of science. This article outlines the relationship between sovereignty and ethics in the context of data to describe the collective rights that Indigenous Peoples assert to increase control over their biomedical data. Then drawing on the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), we explore how standards already set by Native nations in the United States, such as tribal research codes, provide direction for implementation of the CARE Principles to complement FAIR. A broader approach to policy and procedure regarding tribal participation in biomedical research is required and we make recommendations for tribes, institutions, and ethical practice.
KW - CARE principles
KW - Indigenous
KW - data governance
KW - data sovereignty
KW - genetic research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128016424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128016424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fgene.2022.823309
DO - 10.3389/fgene.2022.823309
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128016424
SN - 1664-8021
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Genetics
JF - Frontiers in Genetics
M1 - 823309
ER -