Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging: Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions

S. Di Maria, T. J.A. van Nijnatten, C. R.L.P.N. Jeukens, S. Vedantham, M. Dietzel, P. Vaz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Conventional mammography remains the primary imaging modality for state-of-the-art breast imaging practice and its benefit (both on diagnostic and screening) was largely reported. In mammography, the typical Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) from X-ray radiation to the breast spans, on average, from 1 to 10 mGy, depending on breast thicknesses, percentage of fibroglandular tissue, and on the examination purpose. Methods: The aim of this narrative review is to describe the extent of radiation risk in X-ray breast imaging and discuss the main steps and parameters (e.g. MGD, screening frequency and number of examination views) that may have an influence on the radiation risk assessment. Results: Even though the radiation doses used with these examinations are very low, as compared to other medical or natural radiation exposures, there is a non-negligible associated risk of radiation-induced cancer. Accurate radiation risk assessment permits to better balance the overall estimation of the benefit-to-risk ratio in X-ray breast imaging. Conclusions: It is expected that a better knowledge about radiation-induced cancer risk among population could improve the communications skills between patients and clinicians and could help to increase the awareness in women about radiation risk perception for a transparent and proper informed choice of imaging exam.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number111784
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume181
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Absorbed dose
  • Low doses
  • Mammography
  • Radiation-induced cancer risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging: Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this