Understanding the Impact of Enhanced Recovery Programs on Social Vulnerability, Race, and Colorectal Surgery Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Increasing social vulnerability, measured by the Social Vulnerability Index, has been associated with worse surgical outcomes. However, less is known about the impact of social vulnerability on patients who underwent colorectal surgery under enhanced recovery programs. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that increasing social vulnerability is associated with worse outcomes before enhanced recovery implementation, but that after implementation, disparities in outcomes would be reduced. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using multivariable logistic regression to identify associations of social vulnerability and enhanced recovery with outcomes. SETTINGS: Institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery (2010–2020). Enhanced recovery programs were implemented in 2015. Those adhering to 70% or more of enhanced recovery program components were defined as enhanced recovery and all others as nonenhanced recovery. OUTCOMES: Length of stay, complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: Of 1523 patients, 589 (38.7%) were in the enhanced recovery group, with 625 patients (41%) in the lowest third of the Social Vulnerability Index, 411 (27%) in the highest third. There were no differences in Social Vulnerability Index distribution by the enhanced recovery group. On multivariable modeling, social vulnerability was not associated with increased length of stay, complications, or readmissions in the enhanced recovery group. Black race was associated with increased length of stay in both the nonenhanced recovery (OR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1–1.3) and enhanced recovery groups (OR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1–1.4). Enhanced recovery adherence was associated with reductions in racial disparities in complications as the Black race was associated with increased odds of complications in the nonenhanced recovery group (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2–3.0) but not in the enhanced recovery group (OR 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4–1.6). LIMITATIONS: Details of potential factors affecting enhanced recovery program adherence were not assessed and are the subject of current work by this team. CONCLUSION: High social vulnerability was not associated with worse outcomes among both enhanced recovery and nonenhanced recovery colorectal patients. Enhanced recovery program adherence was associated with reductions in racial disparities in complication rates. However, disparities in length of stay remain, and work is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities.