Understanding dating applications: Reply to Espenshade

James K. Feathers, Douglas D. Dykeman, Ronald H. Towner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


A recent critique (Espenshade, 2004) of an application of luminescence dating in New Mexico represents a misreading of the original work and a misunderstanding of how dates should be interpreted in archaeology. It is well known that the dating event (what is actually being dated) and the target event (what one wants to date) can differ. This difference accounts for the discrepancies noted in the New Mexico study and also makes problematic Espenshade's proposed solution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-287
Number of pages5
JournalNorth American Archaeologist
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology


Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding dating applications: Reply to Espenshade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this