Understanding dating applications: Reply to Espenshade

James K. Feathers; Douglas D. Dykeman; Ronald H. Towner

doi:10.2190/ED4T-PEXQ-JW88-6UEY

Understanding dating applications: Reply to Espenshade

James K. Feathers, Douglas D. Dykeman, Ronald H. Towner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

A recent critique (Espenshade, 2004) of an application of luminescence dating in New Mexico represents a misreading of the original work and a misunderstanding of how dates should be interpreted in archaeology. It is well known that the dating event (what is actually being dated) and the target event (what one wants to date) can differ. This difference accounts for the discrepancies noted in the New Mexico study and also makes problematic Espenshade's proposed solution.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	283-287
Number of pages	5
Journal	North American Archaeologist
Volume	26
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2190/ED4T-PEXQ-JW88-6UEY
State	Published - 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Archaeology
Archaeology

Access to Document

10.2190/ED4T-PEXQ-JW88-6UEY

Cite this

@article{5ea4b441a9af492ba4eb2fb9dd1b1e32,

title = "Understanding dating applications: Reply to Espenshade",

abstract = "A recent critique (Espenshade, 2004) of an application of luminescence dating in New Mexico represents a misreading of the original work and a misunderstanding of how dates should be interpreted in archaeology. It is well known that the dating event (what is actually being dated) and the target event (what one wants to date) can differ. This difference accounts for the discrepancies noted in the New Mexico study and also makes problematic Espenshade's proposed solution.",

author = "Feathers, {James K.} and Dykeman, {Douglas D.} and Towner, {Ronald H.}",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.2190/ED4T-PEXQ-JW88-6UEY",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "26",

pages = "283--287",

journal = "North American Archaeologist",

issn = "0197-6931",

publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding dating applications

T2 - Reply to Espenshade

AU - Feathers, James K.

AU - Dykeman, Douglas D.

AU - Towner, Ronald H.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - A recent critique (Espenshade, 2004) of an application of luminescence dating in New Mexico represents a misreading of the original work and a misunderstanding of how dates should be interpreted in archaeology. It is well known that the dating event (what is actually being dated) and the target event (what one wants to date) can differ. This difference accounts for the discrepancies noted in the New Mexico study and also makes problematic Espenshade's proposed solution.

AB - A recent critique (Espenshade, 2004) of an application of luminescence dating in New Mexico represents a misreading of the original work and a misunderstanding of how dates should be interpreted in archaeology. It is well known that the dating event (what is actually being dated) and the target event (what one wants to date) can differ. This difference accounts for the discrepancies noted in the New Mexico study and also makes problematic Espenshade's proposed solution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60950509987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60950509987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2190/ED4T-PEXQ-JW88-6UEY

DO - 10.2190/ED4T-PEXQ-JW88-6UEY

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:60950509987

SN - 0197-6931

VL - 26

SP - 283

EP - 287

JO - North American Archaeologist

JF - North American Archaeologist

IS - 3

ER -

Understanding dating applications: Reply to Espenshade

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this