Troubling the subject of violence: The pacifist presumption, martial maternalism, and armed women in contemporary gun culture

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Drawing on interviews with men and women gun carriers, this paper considers the intersection of femininity and guns. It argues that two sets of expectations shape the normative relationship between women and guns: First, armed women are a blind spot in feminist discourse, which tends to reproduce the "pacifist presumption" that women are nonviolent caretakers and peacemakers. Second, contemporary pro-gun discourse often bases women's gun carry within their duties and obligations as mothers in a form of "martial maternalism." Inflected with a post-feminist appropriation of rights and equality, this pro-gun discourse reproduces gender binaries through a discourse of gender inclusivity. Following previous analyses that emphasize the contradictory politics of gender in conservative spaces, my analysis emphasizes how the gendered politics of guns is sustained by multiple, though not necessarily shared, understandings of women's guns by men and women within American gun culture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-107
Number of pages27
JournalPolitical Power and Social Theory
Volume30
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Conservative politics
  • Femininity
  • Gun politics
  • Masculinity
  • Protection
  • Self-defense

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Troubling the subject of violence: The pacifist presumption, martial maternalism, and armed women in contemporary gun culture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this