TY - JOUR
T1 - TROLL 4.0
T2 - Representing water and carbon fluxes, leaf phenology, and intraspecific trait variation in a mixed-species individual-based forest dynamics model-Part 2: Model evaluation for two Amazonian sites
AU - Schmitt, Sylvain
AU - Fischer, Fabian J.
AU - Ball, James G.C.
AU - Barbier, Nicolas
AU - Boisseaux, Marion
AU - Bonal, Damien
AU - Burban, Benoit
AU - Chen, Xiuzhi
AU - Derroire, Géraldine
AU - Lichstein, Jeremy W.
AU - Nemetschek, Daniela
AU - Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia
AU - Saleska, Scott
AU - Sellan, Giacomo
AU - Verley, Philippe
AU - Vincent, Grégoire
AU - Ziegler, Camille
AU - Chave, Jérôme
AU - Maréchaux, Isabelle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Sylvain Schmitt et al.
PY - 2025/8/25
Y1 - 2025/8/25
N2 - TROLL 4.0 is an individual-based forest dynamics model that jointly simulates the structure, diversity, and functioning of tropical forests, including their water balance, carbon fluxes, and leaf phenology, while accounting for intraspecific trait variation for a large number of species. In a companion paper, we describe how the model represents the physiological and demographic processes that control the tree life cycle in a 1 m resolution spatially explicit scene and uses plant functional traits measurable in the field to parameterize such processes across species and individuals (Maréchaux et al., 2025). Here we evaluate the performance of TROLL 4.0 for two Amazonian sites with contrasting soil and climate properties. We assessed the model's ability to represent forest structure, composition, and dynamics using lidar-derived spatial distribution of top canopy height and forest inventories combined with information on plant functional traits. We also evaluated the model's ability to represent carbon and water fluxes, as well as leaf area variation, at daily and fortnightly resolution over a decade, using detailed information from on-site eddy covariance towers, satellite data, and ground-based or airborne lidar data. We finally compared the responses of carbon and water fluxes to environmental drivers between simulated and observed data. Overall, TROLL 4.0 provided a realistic representation of forests at both sites. The simulated canopy height distribution showed a high correlation coefficient (CC) with observed aerial and satellite data (CC > 0.92), while the species and functional composition were well represented (CC > 0.75). TROLL 4.0 also realistically simulated the seasonal variability of carbon and water fluxes (CC > 0.46) and their responses to environmental drivers, while capturing temporal variations in leaf area (CC > 0.76) and its partitioning into leaf age cohorts. However, TROLL 4.0 overestimated annual gross primary productivity at both sites (mean RMSEP Combining double low line 0.94 ± 0.67 kgC m-2 yr-1) and evapotranspiration at one site (mean RMSEP Combining double low line 0.75 ± 0.63 mm d-1), likely due to an underestimation of the soil water depletion and stomatal control during the dry season. This evaluation highlights the potential of TROLL 4.0 to represent ecosystem fluxes and the structure, diversity, and dynamics of plant communities at a fine resolution, paving the way for model predictions of the effects of climate change, fragmentation, and forest management on forest structure and dynamics.
AB - TROLL 4.0 is an individual-based forest dynamics model that jointly simulates the structure, diversity, and functioning of tropical forests, including their water balance, carbon fluxes, and leaf phenology, while accounting for intraspecific trait variation for a large number of species. In a companion paper, we describe how the model represents the physiological and demographic processes that control the tree life cycle in a 1 m resolution spatially explicit scene and uses plant functional traits measurable in the field to parameterize such processes across species and individuals (Maréchaux et al., 2025). Here we evaluate the performance of TROLL 4.0 for two Amazonian sites with contrasting soil and climate properties. We assessed the model's ability to represent forest structure, composition, and dynamics using lidar-derived spatial distribution of top canopy height and forest inventories combined with information on plant functional traits. We also evaluated the model's ability to represent carbon and water fluxes, as well as leaf area variation, at daily and fortnightly resolution over a decade, using detailed information from on-site eddy covariance towers, satellite data, and ground-based or airborne lidar data. We finally compared the responses of carbon and water fluxes to environmental drivers between simulated and observed data. Overall, TROLL 4.0 provided a realistic representation of forests at both sites. The simulated canopy height distribution showed a high correlation coefficient (CC) with observed aerial and satellite data (CC > 0.92), while the species and functional composition were well represented (CC > 0.75). TROLL 4.0 also realistically simulated the seasonal variability of carbon and water fluxes (CC > 0.46) and their responses to environmental drivers, while capturing temporal variations in leaf area (CC > 0.76) and its partitioning into leaf age cohorts. However, TROLL 4.0 overestimated annual gross primary productivity at both sites (mean RMSEP Combining double low line 0.94 ± 0.67 kgC m-2 yr-1) and evapotranspiration at one site (mean RMSEP Combining double low line 0.75 ± 0.63 mm d-1), likely due to an underestimation of the soil water depletion and stomatal control during the dry season. This evaluation highlights the potential of TROLL 4.0 to represent ecosystem fluxes and the structure, diversity, and dynamics of plant communities at a fine resolution, paving the way for model predictions of the effects of climate change, fragmentation, and forest management on forest structure and dynamics.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014548214
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105014548214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/gmd-18-5205-2025
DO - 10.5194/gmd-18-5205-2025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105014548214
SN - 1991-959X
VL - 18
SP - 5205
EP - 5243
JO - Geoscientific Model Development
JF - Geoscientific Model Development
IS - 16
ER -