TY - JOUR
T1 - Translational research in aphasia
T2 - From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation
AU - Raymer, Anastasia M.
AU - Beeson, Pelagie
AU - Holland, Audrey
AU - Kendall, Diane
AU - Maher, Lynn M.
AU - Martin, Nadine
AU - Murray, Laura
AU - Rose, Miranda
AU - Thompson, Cynthia K.
AU - Turkstra, Lyn
AU - Altmann, Lori
AU - Boyle, Mary
AU - Conway, Tim
AU - Hula, William
AU - Kearns, Kevin
AU - Rapp, Brenda
AU - Simmons-Mackie, Nina
AU - Gonzalez Rothi, Leslie J.
PY - 2008/2/1
Y1 - 2008/2/1
N2 - Purpose: In this article, the authors encapsulate discussions of the Language Work Group that took place as part of the Workshop in Plasticity/NeuroRehabilitation Research at the University of Florida in April 2005. Method: In this narrative review, they define neuroplasticity and review studies that demonstrate neural changes associated with aphasia recovery and treatment. The authors then summarize basic science evidence from animals, human cognition, and computational neuroscience that is relevant to aphasia treatment research. They then turn to the aphasia treatment literature in which evidence exists to support several of the neuroscience principles. Conclusion: Despite the extant aphasia treatment literature, many questions remain regarding how neuroscience principles can be manipulated to maximize aphasia recovery and treatment. They propose a framework, incorporating some of these principles, that may serve as a potential roadmap for future investigations of aphasia treatment and recovery. In addition to translational investigations from basic to clinical science, the authors propose several areas in which translation can occur from clinical to basic science to contribute to the fundamental knowledge base of neurorehabilitation. This article is intended to reinvigorate interest in delineating the factors influencing successful recovery from aphasia through basic, translational, and clinical research.
AB - Purpose: In this article, the authors encapsulate discussions of the Language Work Group that took place as part of the Workshop in Plasticity/NeuroRehabilitation Research at the University of Florida in April 2005. Method: In this narrative review, they define neuroplasticity and review studies that demonstrate neural changes associated with aphasia recovery and treatment. The authors then summarize basic science evidence from animals, human cognition, and computational neuroscience that is relevant to aphasia treatment research. They then turn to the aphasia treatment literature in which evidence exists to support several of the neuroscience principles. Conclusion: Despite the extant aphasia treatment literature, many questions remain regarding how neuroscience principles can be manipulated to maximize aphasia recovery and treatment. They propose a framework, incorporating some of these principles, that may serve as a potential roadmap for future investigations of aphasia treatment and recovery. In addition to translational investigations from basic to clinical science, the authors propose several areas in which translation can occur from clinical to basic science to contribute to the fundamental knowledge base of neurorehabilitation. This article is intended to reinvigorate interest in delineating the factors influencing successful recovery from aphasia through basic, translational, and clinical research.
KW - Aphasia
KW - Plasticity
KW - Rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849103863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849103863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/020)
DO - 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/020)
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18230850
AN - SCOPUS:38849103863
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 51
SP - S259-S275
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 1
ER -