TY - JOUR
T1 - Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era
T2 - Metadata and Standards
AU - Caffery, Liam J.
AU - Clunie, David
AU - Curiel-Lewandrowski, Clara
AU - Malvehy, Josep
AU - Soyer, H. Peter
AU - Halpern, Allan C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - Imaging is increasingly being used in dermatology for documentation, diagnosis, and management of cutaneous disease. The lack of standards for dermatologic imaging is an impediment to clinical uptake. Standardization can occur in image acquisition, terminology, interoperability, and metadata. This paper presents the International Skin Imaging Collaboration position on standardization of metadata for dermatologic imaging. Metadata is essential to ensure that dermatologic images are properly managed and interpreted. There are two standards-based approaches to recording and storing metadata in dermatologic imaging. The first uses standard consumer image file formats, and the second is the file format and metadata model developed for the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard. DICOM would appear to provide an advantage over using consumer image file formats for metadata as it includes all the patient, study, and technical metadata necessary to use images clinically. Whereas, consumer image file formats only include technical metadata and need to be used in conjunction with another actor—for example, an electronic medical record—to supply the patient and study metadata. The use of DICOM may have some ancillary benefits in dermatologic imaging including leveraging DICOM network and workflow services, interoperability of images and metadata, leveraging existing enterprise imaging infrastructure, greater patient safety, and better compliance to legislative requirements for image retention.
AB - Imaging is increasingly being used in dermatology for documentation, diagnosis, and management of cutaneous disease. The lack of standards for dermatologic imaging is an impediment to clinical uptake. Standardization can occur in image acquisition, terminology, interoperability, and metadata. This paper presents the International Skin Imaging Collaboration position on standardization of metadata for dermatologic imaging. Metadata is essential to ensure that dermatologic images are properly managed and interpreted. There are two standards-based approaches to recording and storing metadata in dermatologic imaging. The first uses standard consumer image file formats, and the second is the file format and metadata model developed for the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard. DICOM would appear to provide an advantage over using consumer image file formats for metadata as it includes all the patient, study, and technical metadata necessary to use images clinically. Whereas, consumer image file formats only include technical metadata and need to be used in conjunction with another actor—for example, an electronic medical record—to supply the patient and study metadata. The use of DICOM may have some ancillary benefits in dermatologic imaging including leveraging DICOM network and workflow services, interoperability of images and metadata, leveraging existing enterprise imaging infrastructure, greater patient safety, and better compliance to legislative requirements for image retention.
KW - DICOM
KW - Dermatology
KW - Enterprise imaging
KW - Metadata
KW - Standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040683464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040683464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10278-017-0045-8
DO - 10.1007/s10278-017-0045-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 29344752
AN - SCOPUS:85040683464
SN - 0897-1889
VL - 31
SP - 568
EP - 577
JO - Journal of Digital Imaging
JF - Journal of Digital Imaging
IS - 4
ER -