Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion

Stijn Conix; Stephen T. Garnett; Kevin R. Thiele; Les Christidis; Peter Paul van Dijk; Olaf S. Bánki; Saroj K. Barik; John S. Buckeridge; Mark J. Costello; Donald Hobern; Paul M. Kirk; Aaron Lien; Svetlana Nikolaeva; Richard L. Pyle; Scott A. Thomson; Zhi Qiang Zhang; Frank E. Zachos

doi:10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x

Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion

Stijn Conix, Stephen T. Garnett, Kevin R. Thiele, Les Christidis, Peter Paul van Dijk, Olaf S. Bánki, Saroj K. Barik, John S. Buckeridge, Mark J. Costello, Donald Hobern, Paul M. Kirk, Aaron Lien, Svetlana Nikolaeva, Richard L. Pyle, Scott A. Thomson, Zhi Qiang Zhang, Frank E. Zachos

Natural Resources and the Environment, School of

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

A global consensus list of the world’s species must be based on the best available taxonomic research, and its contents should not be biased towards certain political or social aims. At the same time, users of any global list must be involved or consulted in its establishment to ensure that the list meets their needs. This paper argues that while these two desiderata— independence and inclusion—might seem to be in conflict, they are in fact compatible. More precisely, it suggests the roles taxonomists and users could play in establishing and maintaining a global consensus list to make sure that this list is both inclusive and independent.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	631-643
Number of pages	13
Journal	Organisms Diversity and Evolution
Volume	21
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x
State	Published - Dec 2021

Keywords

Freedom of science
Independence of science
Taxonomic list
Users of taxonomy
Values in science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Access to Document

10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x

Cite this

Conix, S., Garnett, S. T., Thiele, K. R., Christidis, L., van Dijk, P. P., Bánki, O. S., Barik, S. K., Buckeridge, J. S., Costello, M. J., Hobern, D., Kirk, P. M., Lien, A., Nikolaeva, S., Pyle, R. L., Thomson, S. A., Zhang, Z. Q., & Zachos, F. E. (2021). Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion. Organisms Diversity and Evolution, 21(4), 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x

Conix, S, Garnett, ST, Thiele, KR, Christidis, L, van Dijk, PP, Bánki, OS, Barik, SK, Buckeridge, JS, Costello, MJ, Hobern, D, Kirk, PM, Lien, A, Nikolaeva, S, Pyle, RL, Thomson, SA, Zhang, ZQ & Zachos, FE 2021, 'Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion', Organisms Diversity and Evolution, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x

@article{7d1c4f7982ba4292835092afb141e29f,

title = "Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion",

abstract = "A global consensus list of the world{\textquoteright}s species must be based on the best available taxonomic research, and its contents should not be biased towards certain political or social aims. At the same time, users of any global list must be involved or consulted in its establishment to ensure that the list meets their needs. This paper argues that while these two desiderata— independence and inclusion—might seem to be in conflict, they are in fact compatible. More precisely, it suggests the roles taxonomists and users could play in establishing and maintaining a global consensus list to make sure that this list is both inclusive and independent.",

keywords = "Freedom of science, Independence of science, Taxonomic list, Users of taxonomy, Values in science",

author = "Stijn Conix and Garnett, {Stephen T.} and Thiele, {Kevin R.} and Les Christidis and {van Dijk}, {Peter Paul} and B{\'a}nki, {Olaf S.} and Barik, {Saroj K.} and Buckeridge, {John S.} and Costello, {Mark J.} and Donald Hobern and Kirk, {Paul M.} and Aaron Lien and Svetlana Nikolaeva and Pyle, {Richard L.} and Thomson, {Scott A.} and Zhang, {Zhi Qiang} and Zachos, {Frank E.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Biologische Systematik.",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "21",

pages = "631--643",

journal = "Organisms Diversity and Evolution",

issn = "1439-6092",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion

AU - Conix, Stijn

AU - Garnett, Stephen T.

AU - Thiele, Kevin R.

AU - Christidis, Les

AU - van Dijk, Peter Paul

AU - Bánki, Olaf S.

AU - Barik, Saroj K.

AU - Buckeridge, John S.

AU - Costello, Mark J.

AU - Hobern, Donald

AU - Kirk, Paul M.

AU - Lien, Aaron

AU - Nikolaeva, Svetlana

AU - Pyle, Richard L.

AU - Thomson, Scott A.

AU - Zhang, Zhi Qiang

AU - Zachos, Frank E.

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - A global consensus list of the world’s species must be based on the best available taxonomic research, and its contents should not be biased towards certain political or social aims. At the same time, users of any global list must be involved or consulted in its establishment to ensure that the list meets their needs. This paper argues that while these two desiderata— independence and inclusion—might seem to be in conflict, they are in fact compatible. More precisely, it suggests the roles taxonomists and users could play in establishing and maintaining a global consensus list to make sure that this list is both inclusive and independent.

AB - A global consensus list of the world’s species must be based on the best available taxonomic research, and its contents should not be biased towards certain political or social aims. At the same time, users of any global list must be involved or consulted in its establishment to ensure that the list meets their needs. This paper argues that while these two desiderata— independence and inclusion—might seem to be in conflict, they are in fact compatible. More precisely, it suggests the roles taxonomists and users could play in establishing and maintaining a global consensus list to make sure that this list is both inclusive and independent.

KW - Freedom of science

KW - Independence of science

KW - Taxonomic list

KW - Users of taxonomy

KW - Values in science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110560768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110560768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x

DO - 10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85110560768

SN - 1439-6092

VL - 21

SP - 631

EP - 643

JO - Organisms Diversity and Evolution

JF - Organisms Diversity and Evolution

IS - 4

ER -

Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this