TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a postmaterialist psychology
T2 - Theory, research, and applications
AU - Beauregard, Mario
AU - Trent, Natalie L.
AU - Schwartz, Gary E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper was inspired in part by discussions held at the 2014 International Summit on Postmaterialist Science, Spirituality and Society. The meeting was co-sponsored by the University of Arizona and Columbia University. It was co-organized by Gary Schwartz, Mario Beauregard, and Lisa Miller, and it was supported in part by Canyon Ranch plus an anonymous donor. Among other things, this meeting has led to the writing of the Manifesto for a Postmaterialist Science (to date this document has over 300 signatures from like-minded scientists and philosophers all over the world – see Beauregard et al., 2014 and http://opensciences.org/about/manifesto-for-a-postmaterialist-science). The full proceedings of the meeting are also available (http://www.opensciences.org/files/pdfs/ISPMS-Summary-Report.pdf).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - The majority of mainstream psychologists still adopt a materialist stance toward nature. They believe that science is synonymous with materialism; further, they are convinced that the view that mind and consciousness are simply by-products of brain activity is an incontrovertible fact that has been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. This is an incomplete view of what humans are. In this article, we review two categories of empirical evidence that support a shift toward a postmaterialist psychology. The first category of evidence includes mental events that seem to occur outside the spatial confines of the brain, whereas the second category includes mental events that seem to occur when the brain has ceased to function. Taken together, the two bodies of empirical evidence examined here indicate that the idea that the brain creates mind and consciousness is both incomplete and flawed. In the Discussion section, we argue that the transmission hypothesis of the mind-brain relationship can account for all the evidence presented in this article. We also discuss the emerging postmaterialist paradigm and its potential implications for the evolution of psychology.
AB - The majority of mainstream psychologists still adopt a materialist stance toward nature. They believe that science is synonymous with materialism; further, they are convinced that the view that mind and consciousness are simply by-products of brain activity is an incontrovertible fact that has been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. This is an incomplete view of what humans are. In this article, we review two categories of empirical evidence that support a shift toward a postmaterialist psychology. The first category of evidence includes mental events that seem to occur outside the spatial confines of the brain, whereas the second category includes mental events that seem to occur when the brain has ceased to function. Taken together, the two bodies of empirical evidence examined here indicate that the idea that the brain creates mind and consciousness is both incomplete and flawed. In the Discussion section, we argue that the transmission hypothesis of the mind-brain relationship can account for all the evidence presented in this article. We also discuss the emerging postmaterialist paradigm and its potential implications for the evolution of psychology.
KW - Consciousness
KW - Mind-brain relationship
KW - Postmaterialist paradigm
KW - Psychology
KW - Scientific materialism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042666480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042666480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.02.004
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85042666480
SN - 0732-118X
VL - 50
SP - 21
EP - 33
JO - New Ideas in Psychology
JF - New Ideas in Psychology
ER -