Topological susceptibility with the improved Asqtad action

Claude Bernard, Thomas DeGrand, Anna Hasenfratz, Carleton DeTar, James Osborn, Steven Gottlieb, Eric Gregory, Doug Toussaint, Alistair Hart, Urs M. Heller, James Hetrick, Robert L. Sugar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chiral perturbation theory predicts that in quantum chromodynamics light dynamical quarks suppress the topological (instanton) susceptibility. We investigate this suppression through direct numerical simulation using the Asqtad improved lattice fermion action. This action holds promise for carrying out nonperturbative simulations over a range of quark masses for which chiral perturbation theory is expected to converge. To test the effectiveness of the action in capturing instanton physics, we measure the topological susceptibility as a function of quark masses with [Formula Presented] dynamical flavors. Our results, when extrapolated to zero lattice spacing, are consistent with predictions of leading order chiral perturbation theory. Included in our study is a comparison of three methods for analyzing the topological susceptibility: (1) the Boulder hypercubic blocking technique with the Boulder topological charge operator, (2) the more traditional Wilson cooling method with the twisted plaquette topological charge operator and (3) the improved cooling method of de Forcrand, Perez, and Stamatescu and their improved topological charge operator. We show in one comparison at nonzero lattice spacing that the largest difference between methods (1) and (2) can be attributed to the operator, rather than the smoothing method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPhysical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
Volume68
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Topological susceptibility with the improved Asqtad action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this