TY - JOUR
T1 - Three field experiments on the effects of violations of conversational distance
AU - Burgoon, Judee K.
AU - Aho, Lynn
N1 - Funding Information:
The author wishes to acknowledge the support provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for completing this work. The author also wishes to acknowledge the value of constructive criticisms from Dr. Walter Frick at the U.S. EPA laboratory in Athens, Georgia in addition to those from the reviewers of both the present and previous manuscripts in this area.
PY - 1982/6
Y1 - 1982/6
N2 - The effects of interpersonal reward and violations of conversational distancing expectations on compliance and interaction behaviors were tested in three retail shopping settings. Subjects were salespeople (N = 70, N = 49, N = 104) who were approached by confederates posing as customers or students conducting interviews on consumer behavior. Two levels of interpersonal reward (high versus low levels of apparent status, attractiveness, purchasing power and/or expertise) and three levels of distance (close violation, norm, far violation) were manipulated. Results showed high reward to induce more compliance with a request and more favorable interaction patterns than low reward. Distance violations evoked more arousal, activation and apparent distraction, while the favorability of reactions to distance violations tended to vary by reward level, as expected. Confounding effects of gender, confederate communication style, and possible nonverbal norms for compensation and reciprocity are also discussed.
AB - The effects of interpersonal reward and violations of conversational distancing expectations on compliance and interaction behaviors were tested in three retail shopping settings. Subjects were salespeople (N = 70, N = 49, N = 104) who were approached by confederates posing as customers or students conducting interviews on consumer behavior. Two levels of interpersonal reward (high versus low levels of apparent status, attractiveness, purchasing power and/or expertise) and three levels of distance (close violation, norm, far violation) were manipulated. Results showed high reward to induce more compliance with a request and more favorable interaction patterns than low reward. Distance violations evoked more arousal, activation and apparent distraction, while the favorability of reactions to distance violations tended to vary by reward level, as expected. Confounding effects of gender, confederate communication style, and possible nonverbal norms for compensation and reciprocity are also discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84972857529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84972857529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03637758209376073
DO - 10.1080/03637758209376073
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84972857529
SN - 0363-7751
VL - 49
SP - 71
EP - 88
JO - Communication Monographs
JF - Communication Monographs
IS - 2
ER -