Abstract
In the past, experimental philosophers have explored the psychological underpinning of a number of notions in philosophy, including free will, moral responsibility, and more. But prior to this chapter, although a number of philosophers have speculated on how ordinary folks might, or should, think about the liar paradox, no one had systematically explored the psychological underpinnings of the Liar itself. The authors take on this task. In particular, the chapter investigates the status of a liar sentence, L = ‘Sentence L is false’. The thesis, arrived at by interpreting the data the authors have accrued, is that reflective thinkers (some of whom possess a modicum of philosophical expertise) judge L to be neither true nor false (as opposed to false or true), and the authors see this as some evidence for the claim that L is neither true nor false.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Reflections on the Liar |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 39-70 |
Number of pages | 32 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780199896042 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2017 |
Keywords
- Arne næss
- Cognitive reflection test
- Dual-process theory
- Experimental philosophy
- Liar paradox
- Semantic status
- Truth value
- Wason’s selection task
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Mathematics(all)
- Arts and Humanities(all)