Abstract
Features of experimental design impose auxiliary hypotheses on experimenters. Hertwig & Ortmann rightly argue that the ways some variables are implemented in psychology cloud results, whereas the different implementations in economics provide for more robust results. However, not all design variables support this general conclusion. The repetition of trials may confuse results depending on what theory is being tested. We explore this in the case of simple bargaining games.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 410-411 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2001 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience