The voter news service and the 2000 election night calls

Claire Wardle, Kate Kenski, Dan Orr, Kathleen Hall Jamieson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


After examining the rhetoric of the network broadcast coverage on election night 2000, it is concluded that although individual "decision desk" call times were not identical across networks, there was a consistent pattern of correct and incorrect calls. The language of the election night broadcasts undercut network credibility on two counts. First, the networks largely failed to acknowledge their common reliance on the Voter News Service for their information, creating the impression that independent research by the five different networks was producing identical calls. Second, the networks failed to adequately describe how the calls were being made and the limitations of predictive models in a close election.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2306-2313
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
Issue number12
StatePublished - Aug 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'The voter news service and the 2000 election night calls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this