Abstract
We are currently in the midst of a revival of interest in the virtues. A number of contemporary moral philosophers have defended a virtue-based approach to ethics. But does this renewal of interest in the virtues have much to contribute to medical ethics and medical practice? This paper critically discusses this question. It considers and rejects a number of important arguments that purport to establish the significance of the virtues for medical practice. Against these arguments, the paper seeks to show that while the virtues have a genuine role to play in medical ethics, it is a limited role, one that is subordinate to the role that other moral concepts such as rules and principles play.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 261-275 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Duty
- Ethics
- Physician-assisted suicide
- Pluralism
- Principle
- Rule
- Virtue
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects