TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of mortality patterns in archaeological studies of hominid predatory adaptations
AU - Stiner, Mary C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Many of the ideas presented in this paper are the outcome of my interactions with Lew Binford, Diane Gifford-Gonzalez, Henry Harpending, Steve Kuhn, Lawrence Straus, and Erik Trinkaus. I thank each of them for their insights, guidance, and support in my research. I thank my European colleagues, Amilcare Bietti (Il. di Roma), Antonio Radmilli (U. di Pisa), Aldo Segre and Eugenia Segre-Naldini (1st. Ital. di Paleont. Umana), and Carlo Tozzi (U. di Piss) for generously allowing me to study faunal collections at their institutions. In addition to the individuals named above, I am grateful to Graeme Barker, Anna Maria Bietti-Sestieri, Piero Cassoli, Giorgio Manzi, Claudia Sorrentino, and Barbara Wilkinson for their assistance, kindness, and encouragement during the data collection phases of the project. I also thank Richard Klein, R. Lee Lyman, and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. My research in Italy was made possible by grants from the Institute of International Education (Fulbright Program), the National Science Foundation (BNS-8618410), the L. S. B. Leakey Foundation and the Sigma Xi Scientific Research Society.
PY - 1990/12
Y1 - 1990/12
N2 - Mortality patterns in archaeofaunas can be informative of prehistoric human foraging habits, land use, and, ultimately, evolutionary changes in hominid sociality and ecological niche. The analytical value of mortality patterns is only as great, however, as archaeologists' understanding of the full range of possible causes for patterns in these data. Here, the relationships between mortality patterns in death assemblages and their documented causes are examined. Interspecific comparisons reveal that, while mortality patterns alone cannot diagnose cause, these data are potentially powerful tools for studies of hominid subsistence if supported by taphonomic analyses of bone assemblage formation. Mortality analyses are particularly effective if age frequency data are divided according to life history characteristics of prey species. Comparisons of known modern cases to ungulate assemblages created by Holocene and Pleistocene hominids of westcentral Italy present new information on humans as predators and evolutionary changes therein. These data indicate significantly greater strategic variation in the Middle Paleolithic cases than for all subsequent cultural periods combined. The variation certainly corresponds to two or more distinct foraging/land use strategies, scavenging and ambush hunting-the latter of which became more specialized with time.
AB - Mortality patterns in archaeofaunas can be informative of prehistoric human foraging habits, land use, and, ultimately, evolutionary changes in hominid sociality and ecological niche. The analytical value of mortality patterns is only as great, however, as archaeologists' understanding of the full range of possible causes for patterns in these data. Here, the relationships between mortality patterns in death assemblages and their documented causes are examined. Interspecific comparisons reveal that, while mortality patterns alone cannot diagnose cause, these data are potentially powerful tools for studies of hominid subsistence if supported by taphonomic analyses of bone assemblage formation. Mortality analyses are particularly effective if age frequency data are divided according to life history characteristics of prey species. Comparisons of known modern cases to ungulate assemblages created by Holocene and Pleistocene hominids of westcentral Italy present new information on humans as predators and evolutionary changes therein. These data indicate significantly greater strategic variation in the Middle Paleolithic cases than for all subsequent cultural periods combined. The variation certainly corresponds to two or more distinct foraging/land use strategies, scavenging and ambush hunting-the latter of which became more specialized with time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000465851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000465851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0278-4165(90)90010-B
DO - 10.1016/0278-4165(90)90010-B
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000465851
SN - 0278-4165
VL - 9
SP - 305
EP - 351
JO - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
JF - Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
IS - 4
ER -