TY - JOUR
T1 - The unappreciated challenges of between-unit handoffs
T2 - Negotiating and coordinating across boundaries
AU - Hilligoss, Brian
AU - Cohen, Michael D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org ). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This work was funded by an Investigator Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, by a health services research dissertation grant ( R36HS018758 ) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , and by a dissertation writing award from ProQuest.
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - Although interest in studying and improving handoffs has grown considerably in recent years, a general tendency to treat handoff as a single type of activity has resulted in overlooking important variation and in understudying one consequential type: between-unit handoffs. Using the admission handoff between emergency departments and inpatient services as an example, this conceptual article identifies 2 distinguishing structural features of between-unit transitions and demonstrate how these features create negotiation and coordination challenges that are further complicated by several contextual factors. Between-unit handoffs are distinguished from within-unit handoffs because the former are triggered by patient conditions as opposed to shift schedules and entail working across organizational boundaries rather than within them. Consequently, between-unit handoffs are challenged by several contextual factors, including interprofessional differences, unequal distributions of power among units, frequent lack of established relationships among the involved parties, infrequent face-to-face communication, a lack of awareness of the other unit's state, and the fact that responsibility and control of patients are transferred separately. Implications for improvement are discussed.
AB - Although interest in studying and improving handoffs has grown considerably in recent years, a general tendency to treat handoff as a single type of activity has resulted in overlooking important variation and in understudying one consequential type: between-unit handoffs. Using the admission handoff between emergency departments and inpatient services as an example, this conceptual article identifies 2 distinguishing structural features of between-unit transitions and demonstrate how these features create negotiation and coordination challenges that are further complicated by several contextual factors. Between-unit handoffs are distinguished from within-unit handoffs because the former are triggered by patient conditions as opposed to shift schedules and entail working across organizational boundaries rather than within them. Consequently, between-unit handoffs are challenged by several contextual factors, including interprofessional differences, unequal distributions of power among units, frequent lack of established relationships among the involved parties, infrequent face-to-face communication, a lack of awareness of the other unit's state, and the fact that responsibility and control of patients are transferred separately. Implications for improvement are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872598892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872598892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.009
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 22560466
AN - SCOPUS:84872598892
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 61
SP - 155
EP - 160
JO - Annals of emergency medicine
JF - Annals of emergency medicine
IS - 2
ER -