Abstract
This paper provides an analysis of Italian complex predicates formed by combining a feminine nominalization in-ata and one of three light verbs: fare 'make', dare 'give' and prendere 'take'. We show that the constraints governing the choice of light verb follow from a syntactic approach to argument structure, and that several interpretive differences between complex and simplex predicates formed from the same verb root can be accounted for in a compositional, bottom-up approach. These differences include variation in creation vs. affected interpretations of Theme objects, implications concerning the size of the event described, the (un)availability of a passive alternant, and the agentivity or lack thereof of the subject argument.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-125 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Journal of Linguistics |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2013 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Philosophy
- Linguistics and Language