TY - JOUR
T1 - The strategic use of corporate cash holdings in collective bargaining with labor unions
AU - Klasa, Sandy
AU - Maxwell, William F.
AU - Ortiz-Molina, Hernán
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank an anonymous referee, Amr Addas, Tom Bates, Edith Ginglinger, Jarrad Harford, David Haushalter, Jean Helwege, Marcin Kacperczyk, Kathy Kahle, Kai Li, Sattar Mansi, Josh Rosett, Bill Schwert, Husayn Shahrur, Janet Smith, Mike Stegemoller, Marc Weidenmier, and seminar participants at the University of Arizona, the 2007 Northern Finance Association Conference, and the 2008 French Finance Association Conference for helpful suggestions. Hernán Ortiz-Molina acknowledges the financial support provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We are grateful to Barry Hirsch for providing us with his firm-level estimates of collective bargaining coverage. Tyler Brough and Aseem Vyas provided excellent research assistance.
PY - 2009/6
Y1 - 2009/6
N2 - We provide evidence that firms in more unionized industries strategically hold less cash to gain bargaining advantages over labor unions and shelter corporate income from their demands. Specifically, we show that corporate cash holdings are negatively related with unionization. We also find that this relation is stronger for firms that are likely to place a higher value on gaining a bargaining advantage over unions and weaker for those firms in which lower cash holdings provide less credible evidence that a firm is unable to concede to union demands. Additionally, we show that for unionized firms increases in cash holdings raise the probability of a strike. Finally, we show that unionization decreases the market value of a dollar of cash holdings. Overall, our findings indicate that firms trade-off the benefits of corporate cash holdings with the costs resulting from a weaker bargaining position with labor.
AB - We provide evidence that firms in more unionized industries strategically hold less cash to gain bargaining advantages over labor unions and shelter corporate income from their demands. Specifically, we show that corporate cash holdings are negatively related with unionization. We also find that this relation is stronger for firms that are likely to place a higher value on gaining a bargaining advantage over unions and weaker for those firms in which lower cash holdings provide less credible evidence that a firm is unable to concede to union demands. Additionally, we show that for unionized firms increases in cash holdings raise the probability of a strike. Finally, we show that unionization decreases the market value of a dollar of cash holdings. Overall, our findings indicate that firms trade-off the benefits of corporate cash holdings with the costs resulting from a weaker bargaining position with labor.
KW - Cash holdings
KW - Corporate liquidity policy
KW - Labor unions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349143981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349143981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.07.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.07.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67349143981
SN - 0304-405X
VL - 92
SP - 421
EP - 442
JO - Journal of Financial Economics
JF - Journal of Financial Economics
IS - 3
ER -