TY - JOUR
T1 - The speech perception gap in cochlear implant patients
AU - Franks, Zechariah G.
AU - Jacob, Abraham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Objective: To determine how commonly word recognition scores obtained using insert microphones (PB max) overestimate word recognition scores obtained through appropriately fit hearing aids (A-WRS). Methods: Aided speech recognition tests may not be performed during routine hearing aid fittings; however, they are regularly performed for cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluation. Therefore, audiologic data from CI recipients were queried in a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center. PB max and A-WRS were obtained. The Speech Perception (SP) gap, defined as PB max minus A-WRS, was calculated for each patient and a high SP gap was defined as ≥20%. Results: Analyzing 78 patients with complete data, 30 patients had PB max ≥20%. Of these, 18 (60%) had a high SP gap. Eighteen of the 78 patients had PB max ≥40%, and of these patients, 15 (83%) had a high SP gap. Discussion/conclusion: A Speech Perception Gap of ≥20% may exist in a sizable percentage of patients with hearing loss. Our pilot study suggests that over 80% of these patients could have Class D hearing (speech recognition <50%) using conventional hearing aids and may be better served using alternate rehabilitation strategies such as middle ear or cochlear implants. Therefore, aided speech testing should be performed as part of a verified hearing aid fit in all patients, especially those with PB Max ranging from 40% to 70%.
AB - Objective: To determine how commonly word recognition scores obtained using insert microphones (PB max) overestimate word recognition scores obtained through appropriately fit hearing aids (A-WRS). Methods: Aided speech recognition tests may not be performed during routine hearing aid fittings; however, they are regularly performed for cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluation. Therefore, audiologic data from CI recipients were queried in a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center. PB max and A-WRS were obtained. The Speech Perception (SP) gap, defined as PB max minus A-WRS, was calculated for each patient and a high SP gap was defined as ≥20%. Results: Analyzing 78 patients with complete data, 30 patients had PB max ≥20%. Of these, 18 (60%) had a high SP gap. Eighteen of the 78 patients had PB max ≥40%, and of these patients, 15 (83%) had a high SP gap. Discussion/conclusion: A Speech Perception Gap of ≥20% may exist in a sizable percentage of patients with hearing loss. Our pilot study suggests that over 80% of these patients could have Class D hearing (speech recognition <50%) using conventional hearing aids and may be better served using alternate rehabilitation strategies such as middle ear or cochlear implants. Therefore, aided speech testing should be performed as part of a verified hearing aid fit in all patients, especially those with PB Max ranging from 40% to 70%.
KW - Cochlear Implant
KW - Hearing Aid
KW - Hearing Aid Fit
KW - Hearing Aid Fitting
KW - Sensorineural Hearing Loss
KW - Speech Perception Gap
KW - Speech Recognition
KW - Word Recognition Score
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062355565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062355565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14670100.2019.1582165
DO - 10.1080/14670100.2019.1582165
M3 - Article
C2 - 30806176
AN - SCOPUS:85062355565
SN - 1467-0100
JO - Cochlear implants international
JF - Cochlear implants international
ER -