TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of personal and communal religiosity in the context of bereavement
AU - Stelzer, Eva Maria
AU - Palitsky, Roman
AU - Hernandez, Emily N.
AU - Ramirez, Eli G.
AU - O’Connor, Mary Frances
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2020/1/2
Y1 - 2020/1/2
N2 - Religion and spirituality often become relevant after the death of a loved one. In light of the multidimensionality of religion and spirituality, we investigate the role of communal religiosity in predicting associations between personal religiosity and bereavement outcomes. A mixed-methods analysis of interviews and questionnaires from 33 bereaved adults was conducted. Interview mentions of personal and communal religiosity, and their associations with self-reported religious coping and grief symptoms, were assessed. Personal (β = 0.55, p <.01) and communal religiosity (β = 0.50, p <.01) predicted positive religious coping, as well as negative religious coping and grief severity (β = 0.53, p <.01). In addition, personal religiosity predicted more negative religious coping for participants who expressed low communal religiosity, β = 1.58, SE =.15, t(28) = 4.08, p <.001. After loss, personal religiosity by itself is not necessarily protective. The presence of personal and communal religiosity contributes to positive religious coping, and reduced negative religious coping. However, the absence of communal religiosity indicates vulnerability.
AB - Religion and spirituality often become relevant after the death of a loved one. In light of the multidimensionality of religion and spirituality, we investigate the role of communal religiosity in predicting associations between personal religiosity and bereavement outcomes. A mixed-methods analysis of interviews and questionnaires from 33 bereaved adults was conducted. Interview mentions of personal and communal religiosity, and their associations with self-reported religious coping and grief symptoms, were assessed. Personal (β = 0.55, p <.01) and communal religiosity (β = 0.50, p <.01) predicted positive religious coping, as well as negative religious coping and grief severity (β = 0.53, p <.01). In addition, personal religiosity predicted more negative religious coping for participants who expressed low communal religiosity, β = 1.58, SE =.15, t(28) = 4.08, p <.001. After loss, personal religiosity by itself is not necessarily protective. The presence of personal and communal religiosity contributes to positive religious coping, and reduced negative religious coping. However, the absence of communal religiosity indicates vulnerability.
KW - Bereavement
KW - death
KW - grief
KW - loss
KW - religion
KW - religious coping
KW - spirituality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066609135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066609135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10852352.2019.1617523
DO - 10.1080/10852352.2019.1617523
M3 - Article
C2 - 31140951
AN - SCOPUS:85066609135
SN - 1085-2352
VL - 48
SP - 64
EP - 80
JO - Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community
JF - Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community
IS - 1
ER -