Buchanan examines, and finds inadequate, several philosophical approaches to justifying and specifying the content of a universal right to a decent minimum of health care: utilitarian arguments, Rawlsian ideal contract arguments, and Norman Daniels' equality of opportunity argument. Also rejecting the libertarian hypothesis that there is no right to a decent minimum of care, he contends that the claim that society should guarantee certain health care services can be supported by a pluralistic approach encompassing special right-claims, harm prevention, prudential arguments emphasizing public health benefits, and beneficence.
|Number of pages
|Philosophy and Public Affairs
|Published - Dec 1984
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Political Science and International Relations
- History and Philosophy of Science