The reliability of randomized algorithms

Don Fallis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Recently, certain philosophers of mathematics (Fallis [1997]; Womack and Farach [1997]) have argued that there are no epistemic considerations that should stop mathematicians from using probabilistic methods to establish that mathematical propositions are true. However, mathematicians clearly should not use methods that are unreliable. Unfortunately, due to the fact that randomized algorithms are not really random in practice, there is reason to doubt their reliability. In this paper, I analyze the prospects for establishing that randomized algorithms are reliable. I end by arguing that it would be inconsistent for mathematicians to suspend judgement on the truth of mathematical propositions on the basis of worries about the reliability of randomized algorithms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-271
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science


Dive into the research topics of 'The reliability of randomized algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this