Abstract
Theory: Using generalizability theory, we discuss the O'Brien (1990) method of aggregate-level reliability assessment. We contrast this theoretical conception of reliability with the theory of individual-level internal consistency. Methods: The methodology used is the O'Brien (1990) aggregate-level reliability technique for the R:A design, where "R" denotes that survey respondents reside or are nested within aggregate units (A). The aggregate unit in this analysis is the state. One-way analysis of variance is used to estimate reliabilities. Results: Individual-level measures of reliability are inappropriate techniques when one is evaluating the reliability of aggregated measures of public opinion. Estimating aggregate-level reliability is methodologically simple and should be a common practice among the many researchers using aggregate-level variables created from individual-level data.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 295-309 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | American Journal of Political Science |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1996 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations