The relationship between semantics, phonology, and naming performance in aphasia: a structural equation modeling approach

Fatima Jebahi, Aneta Kielar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The exploration of naming error patterns in aphasia provides insights into the cognitive processes underlying naming performance. We investigated how semantic and phonological abilities correlate and how they influence naming performance in aphasia. Data from 296 individuals with aphasia, drawn from the Moss Aphasia Psycholinguistics Project Database, were analyzed using a structural equation model. The model incorporated latent variables for semantics and phonology and manifest variables for naming accuracy and error patterns. There was a moderate positive correlation between semantics and phonology after controlling for overall aphasia severity. Both semantic and phonological abilities influenced naming accuracy. Semantic abilities negatively related to semantic, mixed, unrelated errors, and no responses. Interestingly, phonology positively affected semantic errors. Additionally, phonological abilities negatively related to each of phonological and neologism errors. These results highlight the role of semantic and phonological skills on naming performance in aphasia and reveal a relationship between these cognitive processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-128
Number of pages16
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Volume41
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • error patterns
  • naming
  • phonology
  • semantics
  • structural equation modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between semantics, phonology, and naming performance in aphasia: a structural equation modeling approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this