The reciprocal effects of program evaluation on service delivery for the SPNS adolescent HIV outreach and treatment programs

Douglas N. Bell; Geri Botwinick; Jaime Martinez; Randall L. Sell; Kimberly Shaw; Lynn E. Walker; Jo L. Sotheran; Robert L. Johnson; Lawrence B. Friedman; Sally Dodds; Carl Siciliano

doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1

The reciprocal effects of program evaluation on service delivery for the SPNS adolescent HIV outreach and treatment programs

Douglas N. Bell, Geri Botwinick, Jaime Martinez, Randall L. Sell, Kimberly Shaw, Lynn E. Walker, Jo L. Sotheran, Robert L. Johnson, Lawrence B. Friedman, Sally Dodds, Carl Siciliano

Integrative Medicine, Andrew Weil Center for

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the contexts within which the Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) Adolescent HIV Outreach and Treatment programs were evaluated, the effects their evaluations had on their respective programs and, in turn, the effects the program delivery had on the evaluations. Method: The full range of process evaluation heuristics were used to analyze the bi-directional effects of conducting field-based, service delivery data collection. Results: Although data collection efforts sometimes interfered with service delivery, and vice versa, several notable positive effects were disclosed. Conclusion: Specific guidance and recommendations were provided to program designers, behavioral researchers and institutional funding decision makers. Primary amongst them was a call for research evaluation designs that allow for maximum flexibility.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	55-65
Number of pages	11
Journal	Journal of Adolescent Health
Volume	33
Issue number	2 SUPPL. 2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1
State	Published - Aug 1 2003

Keywords

Adolescents
HIV outreach and treatment
Process evaluation
Program evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Psychiatry and Mental health

Access to Document

10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1

Cite this

Bell, D. N., Botwinick, G., Martinez, J., Sell, R. L., Shaw, K., Walker, L. E., Sotheran, J. L., Johnson, R. L., Friedman, L. B., Dodds, S., & Siciliano, C. (2003). The reciprocal effects of program evaluation on service delivery for the SPNS adolescent HIV outreach and treatment programs. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33(2 SUPPL. 2), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1

Bell, DN, Botwinick, G, Martinez, J, Sell, RL, Shaw, K, Walker, LE, Sotheran, JL, Johnson, RL, Friedman, LB, Dodds, S & Siciliano, C 2003, 'The reciprocal effects of program evaluation on service delivery for the SPNS adolescent HIV outreach and treatment programs', Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 33, no. 2 SUPPL. 2, pp. 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1

@article{37c0324ca1fe4472b0b83ebee2aec6e3,

title = "The reciprocal effects of program evaluation on service delivery for the SPNS adolescent HIV outreach and treatment programs",

abstract = "Purpose: To describe the contexts within which the Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) Adolescent HIV Outreach and Treatment programs were evaluated, the effects their evaluations had on their respective programs and, in turn, the effects the program delivery had on the evaluations. Method: The full range of process evaluation heuristics were used to analyze the bi-directional effects of conducting field-based, service delivery data collection. Results: Although data collection efforts sometimes interfered with service delivery, and vice versa, several notable positive effects were disclosed. Conclusion: Specific guidance and recommendations were provided to program designers, behavioral researchers and institutional funding decision makers. Primary amongst them was a call for research evaluation designs that allow for maximum flexibility.",

keywords = "Adolescents, HIV outreach and treatment, Process evaluation, Program evaluation",

author = "Bell, {Douglas N.} and Geri Botwinick and Jaime Martinez and Sell, {Randall L.} and Kimberly Shaw and Walker, {Lynn E.} and Sotheran, {Jo L.} and Johnson, {Robert L.} and Friedman, {Lawrence B.} and Sally Dodds and Carl Siciliano",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by grants from: HIV/AIDS Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Kaiser Family Foundation. ",

year = "2003",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "33",

pages = "55--65",

journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",

issn = "1054-139X",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "2 SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reciprocal effects of program evaluation on service delivery for the SPNS adolescent HIV outreach and treatment programs

AU - Bell, Douglas N.

AU - Botwinick, Geri

AU - Martinez, Jaime

AU - Sell, Randall L.

AU - Shaw, Kimberly

AU - Walker, Lynn E.

AU - Sotheran, Jo L.

AU - Johnson, Robert L.

AU - Friedman, Lawrence B.

AU - Dodds, Sally

AU - Siciliano, Carl

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by grants from: HIV/AIDS Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Kaiser Family Foundation.

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - Purpose: To describe the contexts within which the Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) Adolescent HIV Outreach and Treatment programs were evaluated, the effects their evaluations had on their respective programs and, in turn, the effects the program delivery had on the evaluations. Method: The full range of process evaluation heuristics were used to analyze the bi-directional effects of conducting field-based, service delivery data collection. Results: Although data collection efforts sometimes interfered with service delivery, and vice versa, several notable positive effects were disclosed. Conclusion: Specific guidance and recommendations were provided to program designers, behavioral researchers and institutional funding decision makers. Primary amongst them was a call for research evaluation designs that allow for maximum flexibility.

AB - Purpose: To describe the contexts within which the Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) Adolescent HIV Outreach and Treatment programs were evaluated, the effects their evaluations had on their respective programs and, in turn, the effects the program delivery had on the evaluations. Method: The full range of process evaluation heuristics were used to analyze the bi-directional effects of conducting field-based, service delivery data collection. Results: Although data collection efforts sometimes interfered with service delivery, and vice versa, several notable positive effects were disclosed. Conclusion: Specific guidance and recommendations were provided to program designers, behavioral researchers and institutional funding decision makers. Primary amongst them was a call for research evaluation designs that allow for maximum flexibility.

KW - Adolescents

KW - HIV outreach and treatment

KW - Process evaluation

KW - Program evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041666710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041666710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1

DO - 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00155-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 12888288

AN - SCOPUS:0041666710

SN - 1054-139X

VL - 33

SP - 55

EP - 65

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

IS - 2 SUPPL. 2

ER -

The reciprocal effects of program evaluation on service delivery for the SPNS adolescent HIV outreach and treatment programs

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this