TY - JOUR
T1 - The Psychology of Neoliberalism and the Neoliberalism of Psychology
AU - Adams, Glenn
AU - Estrada-Villalta, Sara
AU - Sullivan, Daniel
AU - Markus, Hazel Rose
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - In this article, we approach the relationship between neoliberalism and psychological science from the theoretical perspective of cultural psychology. In the first section, we trace how engagement with neoliberal systems results in characteristic tendencies—including a radical abstraction of self from social and material context, an entrepreneurial understanding of self as an ongoing development project, an imperative for personal growth and fulfillment, and an emphasis on affect management for self-regulation—that increasingly constitute the knowledge base of mainstream psychological science. However, as we consider in the second section, psychological science is not just an observer of neoliberalism and its impact on psychological experience. Instead, by studying psychological processes independent of cultural–ecological or historical context and by championing individual growth and affective regulation as the key to optimal well-being, psychological scientists reproduce and reinforce the influence and authority of neoliberal systems. Rather than a disinterested bystander, hegemonic forms of psychological science are thoroughly implicated in the neoliberal project.
AB - In this article, we approach the relationship between neoliberalism and psychological science from the theoretical perspective of cultural psychology. In the first section, we trace how engagement with neoliberal systems results in characteristic tendencies—including a radical abstraction of self from social and material context, an entrepreneurial understanding of self as an ongoing development project, an imperative for personal growth and fulfillment, and an emphasis on affect management for self-regulation—that increasingly constitute the knowledge base of mainstream psychological science. However, as we consider in the second section, psychological science is not just an observer of neoliberalism and its impact on psychological experience. Instead, by studying psychological processes independent of cultural–ecological or historical context and by championing individual growth and affective regulation as the key to optimal well-being, psychological scientists reproduce and reinforce the influence and authority of neoliberal systems. Rather than a disinterested bystander, hegemonic forms of psychological science are thoroughly implicated in the neoliberal project.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061289566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061289566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/josi.12305
DO - 10.1111/josi.12305
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061289566
SN - 0022-4537
VL - 75
SP - 189
EP - 216
JO - Journal of Social Issues
JF - Journal of Social Issues
IS - 1
ER -