TY - JOUR
T1 - The nexus
T2 - reconsidering environmental security and adaptive capacity
AU - de Grenade, R.
AU - House-Peters, L.
AU - Scott, C. A.
AU - Thapa, B.
AU - Mills-Novoa, M.
AU - Gerlak, A.
AU - Verbist, K.
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to express our gratitude to Margaret Wilder and Gregg Garfin for coordinating the workshop ‘Metrics and Measurement of Adaptation and Water Security: Advances in Water Research in the Arid Americas,’ convened by the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy at the University of Arizona, at which we initiated these discussions. Special thanks are due to Robert Merideth for editing input. We acknowledge partial support for this review from the International Water Security Network, funded by Lloyd's Register Foundation (LRF) , a charitable foundation in the United Kingdom helping to protect life and property by supporting engineering-related education, public engagement, and the application of research; from the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), for Project SGP-CRA005, which is supported by U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) grant GEO-1138881 , and for Research Project CRN3056, which is supported by NSF grant GEO-1128040 ; and from NSF Grant DEB-1010495 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - The water–energy–food nexus has emerged as a productive discourse and methodology in academic research, science-policy dialogues, and development agendas. While the nexus provides a robust framework for interdisciplinary study, research remains focused on synergies and tradeoffs in resource ‘security’ and fails to adequately acknowledge the environment as the set of natural processes underpinning the nexus, particularly interactions among water, energy, and food. Resource security as a reductionist discourse does not address the limitations and potential of natural processes and the dynamic nature of human processes, especially adaptation to global change. A review of recent literature highlights the need to redefine the nexus to fundamentally incorporate the environment, and, drawing on social–ecological systems thinking, to integrate considerations of adaptive capacity and resilience within nexus theory and practice. Future directions for this line of inquiry include identifying feasible ways of assessing the nexus in the context of dynamic social and ecological systems, and implications that adaptive actions have across resource-use sectors and the environment. A more holistic nexus framework enhances our options to manage environmental interactions, human activities, and policies to adapt to global-change uncertainties.
AB - The water–energy–food nexus has emerged as a productive discourse and methodology in academic research, science-policy dialogues, and development agendas. While the nexus provides a robust framework for interdisciplinary study, research remains focused on synergies and tradeoffs in resource ‘security’ and fails to adequately acknowledge the environment as the set of natural processes underpinning the nexus, particularly interactions among water, energy, and food. Resource security as a reductionist discourse does not address the limitations and potential of natural processes and the dynamic nature of human processes, especially adaptation to global change. A review of recent literature highlights the need to redefine the nexus to fundamentally incorporate the environment, and, drawing on social–ecological systems thinking, to integrate considerations of adaptive capacity and resilience within nexus theory and practice. Future directions for this line of inquiry include identifying feasible ways of assessing the nexus in the context of dynamic social and ecological systems, and implications that adaptive actions have across resource-use sectors and the environment. A more holistic nexus framework enhances our options to manage environmental interactions, human activities, and policies to adapt to global-change uncertainties.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996921186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996921186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.10.009
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84996921186
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 21
SP - 15
EP - 21
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -