Geocronología U-Pb de circones detríticos del Mesozoico inferior de Sonora, México y sus implicaciones paleogeográficas

Translated title of the contribution: The lower Mesozoic record of detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of Sonora, México, and its paleogeographic implications

Carlos M. González-León, Victor A. Valencia, Timothy F. Lawton, Jeffrey M. Amato, George E. Gehrels, William J. Leggett, Oscar Montijo-Contreras, Miguel A. Fernández

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations


Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology from each of the formations of the Triassic-Lower Jurassic Barranca and El Antimonio groups of central and northwestern Sonora and from the Lower Jurassic Basomari and Middle Jurassic Lily formations of northern Sonora indicate they contain distinctive zircon populations. A Proterozoic population has peak ages near 1.8, 1.7, 1.6, 1.4, and 1.1 Ga. A population of Permo-Triassic grains with important peak ages near 269, 254, 245, 234 and 227 Ma. A third population of Early Jurassic age (~190 Ma) is only present in the middle member of the Lower Jurassic Sierra de Santa Rosa Formation and in the Basomari Formation. The fourth population of Middle Jurassic zircons with age peaks near 168 and 162 Ma is only present in the Lily Formation. A fifth population of Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic zircons, present only in the Basomari and Lily Formations, has Silurian and Devonian grains (~430 - 380 Ma) and Neoproterozoic grains (590 - 547 Ma). Possible source areas for these populations are Proterozoic igneous and metamorphic basement and/or Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic sandstones of southwestern USA and Sonora, the mostly Triassic magmatic arc of the Mojave Desert in California and the Permo-Triassic arc of northern Mexico, the Jurassic continental magmatic arc of southwestern North America, and the Jurassic eolian sand seas in Arizona. Regional lithofacies, fossils, and paleocurrents indicate that the Barranca Group records a large fluvio-deltaic system on the margin of the El Antimonio marine basin, and Proterozoic and Permo-Triassic zircon populations common to the Barranca and El Antimonio Groups indicate that detritus was derived from the same source areas to the north. Lithofacies, age, and detrital zircon populations of the Basomari and Lily Formations indicate that they were deposited within the Jurassic magmatic arc of North America. The Basomari and Lilly Formations contain abundant Early Jurassic zircon grains, as does the middle member of the Sierra de Santa Rosa Formation; however, the Sierra de Santa Rosa Formation lacks a Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic grain population present in the Basomari and Lily Formations. The Basomari Formation, which is located north of the proposed trace of the Mojave-Sonora megashear, contains Proterozoic granitic clasts derived from Caborcan basement, which suggests that the Caborca block must have been located close to the Basomari basin by Early Jurassic time, a relation that contradicts the existence of the Mojave-Sonora megashear. The new data also indicate a maximum Early Triassic depositional age for the previously undated Arrayanes Formation and correlation with the Antimonio Formation on the basis of a shared young detrital zircon peak age at ~254 Ma. A Coyotes Formation sample fails to confirm its supposed Early Jurassic age as it only yielded Proterozoic grains. Young zircon grain ages in the Lily Formation indicate a maximum Middle Jurassic age for that formation.

Translated title of the contributionThe lower Mesozoic record of detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of Sonora, México, and its paleogeographic implications
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)301-314
Number of pages14
JournalRevista Mexicana de Ciencias Geologicas
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2009


  • Barranca group
  • Detrital zircon
  • El antimonio group
  • Mexico
  • Sonora
  • Triassic-jurassic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology


Dive into the research topics of 'The lower Mesozoic record of detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of Sonora, México, and its paleogeographic implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this