Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: A study of 379 reversed vein grafts

  • Joseph L. Mills
  • , E. John Harris
  • , Lloyd M. Taylor
  • , W. Clark Beckett
  • , John M. Porter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To assess the utility of routine duplex surveillance, 379 infrainguinal reversed vein grafts performed at two independent teaching hospitals were prospectively entered into a surveillance protocol from March 1986 through August 1989. An average of 3.2 postoperative duplex graft flow velocity (GFV) measurements per graft was obtained during a mean follow-up interval of 21 1 2 months. Only 2.1% of 280 grafts with GFV measurements greater than 45 cm/sec failed within 6 months of a normal surveillance examination. GFV measurements less than 45 cm/sec in 99 grafts led to arteriography in 75 grafts, identifying 50 stenotic lesions in 48 bypasses (12.6% of series). Inflow lesions were present in 5%, outflow stenoses in 2%, and intrinsic graft stenoses in only 6% of bypasses. Only 29% of grafts identified as failing by duplex scan were associated with a reduction in ankle-brachial index of greater than 0.15. Secondary reconstructions were performed in 48 grafts based on detection of a reduced GFV measurement; all such reconstructions are patent after a mean follow-up of 5 months. Duplex surveillance is more reliable in identification of failing vein grafts than is determination of ankle-brachial index.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-389
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of vascular surgery
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1990
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: A study of 379 reversed vein grafts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this