TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of on-wafer calibration method on the measured results of coplanar waveguide circuits
AU - Li, Qian
AU - Melde, Kathleen L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received September 26, 2008; revised May 13, 2009. First published October 02, 2009; current version published February 26, 2010. This work was supported by the Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) under Task ID 1292.063. This work was recommended for publication by Associate Editor J. Tan upon evaluation of the reviewers comments.
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - This paper compares four commonly used on-wafer calibration methods including multiline thru-reflect-line (TRL), line-reflect-reflect-match, line-reflect-match, and short-open-load- thru, for three diverse coplanar waveguide (CPW) circuits. The magnitudes and phases of S11 and S 21 of the CPW circuits are compared to quantify how the specific calibration method influences measured scattering parameters. Special care is taken to ensure that the measured scattering parameters are normalized to the same reference impedance and reference plane for accurate comparison. The measured results are compared with full-wave simulations to provide additional assessment of accuracy. A method to de-embed the discontinuity of the CPW at the probe tip and the CPW of the test structures is presented. The effect of probe-to-device-under-test discontinuity is effectively modeled by one- or two- section of shunt capacitor and series inductor. The results show that the multiline TRL calibration method provides the highest transmission coefficient repeatability on not well-matched circuits and highest accuracy on the three circuits in this paper up to 40 GHz.
AB - This paper compares four commonly used on-wafer calibration methods including multiline thru-reflect-line (TRL), line-reflect-reflect-match, line-reflect-match, and short-open-load- thru, for three diverse coplanar waveguide (CPW) circuits. The magnitudes and phases of S11 and S 21 of the CPW circuits are compared to quantify how the specific calibration method influences measured scattering parameters. Special care is taken to ensure that the measured scattering parameters are normalized to the same reference impedance and reference plane for accurate comparison. The measured results are compared with full-wave simulations to provide additional assessment of accuracy. A method to de-embed the discontinuity of the CPW at the probe tip and the CPW of the test structures is presented. The effect of probe-to-device-under-test discontinuity is effectively modeled by one- or two- section of shunt capacitor and series inductor. The results show that the multiline TRL calibration method provides the highest transmission coefficient repeatability on not well-matched circuits and highest accuracy on the three circuits in this paper up to 40 GHz.
KW - Coplanar waveguide (CPW)
KW - High-frequency packaging
KW - On-wafer measurements
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949274558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949274558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TADVP.2009.2025365
DO - 10.1109/TADVP.2009.2025365
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77949274558
SN - 1521-3323
VL - 33
SP - 285
EP - 292
JO - IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging
JF - IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging
IS - 1
M1 - 5276812
ER -