TY - JOUR
T1 - The Feasibility of Blinding Residency Programs to USMLE Step 1 Scores During GME Application, Interview, and Match Processes
AU - Smith, Kathy W.
AU - Amini, Richard
AU - Banerjee, Madhulika
AU - Clemens, Conrad J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background With the recent announcement that Step 1 score reporting will soon change to pass/fail, residency programs will need to reconsider their recruitment processes. Objective We (1) evaluated the feasibility of blinding residency programs to applicants’ Step 1 scores and their number of attempts throughout the recruitment process; (2) described the selection process that resulted from the blinding; and (3) reviewed if a program’s initial rank list, created before scores were known, would be changed before submission for the Match. Methods During the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 recruitment seasons, all programs at a single sponsoring institution were invited to develop selection criteria in the absence of Step 1 data, and to remain blinded to this data throughout recruitment. Participating programs were surveyed to determine factors affecting feasibility and metrics used for residency selection. Once unblinded to Step 1 scores, programs had the option to change their initial rank lists. Results Of 24 residency programs, 4 participated (17%) in the first year: emergency medicine, neurology, pediatrics, and psychiatry. The second year had the same participants, with the addition of family and community medicine and radiation oncology (n = 6, 25%). Each program was able to determine mission-specific qualities in the absence of Step 1 data. In both years, one program made changes to the final rank list. Conclusions It was feasible for programs to establish metrics for residency recruitment in the absence of Step 1 data, and most programs made no changes to final rank lists after Step 1 scores were known.
AB - Background With the recent announcement that Step 1 score reporting will soon change to pass/fail, residency programs will need to reconsider their recruitment processes. Objective We (1) evaluated the feasibility of blinding residency programs to applicants’ Step 1 scores and their number of attempts throughout the recruitment process; (2) described the selection process that resulted from the blinding; and (3) reviewed if a program’s initial rank list, created before scores were known, would be changed before submission for the Match. Methods During the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 recruitment seasons, all programs at a single sponsoring institution were invited to develop selection criteria in the absence of Step 1 data, and to remain blinded to this data throughout recruitment. Participating programs were surveyed to determine factors affecting feasibility and metrics used for residency selection. Once unblinded to Step 1 scores, programs had the option to change their initial rank lists. Results Of 24 residency programs, 4 participated (17%) in the first year: emergency medicine, neurology, pediatrics, and psychiatry. The second year had the same participants, with the addition of family and community medicine and radiation oncology (n = 6, 25%). Each program was able to determine mission-specific qualities in the absence of Step 1 data. In both years, one program made changes to the final rank list. Conclusions It was feasible for programs to establish metrics for residency recruitment in the absence of Step 1 data, and most programs made no changes to final rank lists after Step 1 scores were known.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105971744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105971744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00653.1
DO - 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00653.1
M3 - Article
C2 - 33897962
AN - SCOPUS:85105971744
SN - 1949-8349
VL - 13
SP - 276
EP - 280
JO - Journal of graduate medical education
JF - Journal of graduate medical education
IS - 2
ER -